- Bill Barr tells senators that he personally favors marijuana being federally outlawed but acknowledged that was a decision for Congress
- He told senators on first day of his confirmation hearing that he would not go after legal pot businesses in states where drug is legal
- 'To the extent that people are complying with the state laws, distribution and production and so forth, we're not going to go after that,' Barr said
- Came on day when Barr was quizzed on Mueller probe and relations with Trump
President Donald Trump's pick to become
the next attorney general said Tuesday that he would 'not go after'
marijuana companies in states where cannabis is legal, even though he
personally believes the drug should be outlawed.
In
his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, William Barr said
he would not use limited government resources to target cannabis
businesses that are complying with state laws.
Businesses
in the marijuana industry relied on Obama-era guidance that kept
federal authorities from cracking down on the pot trade in states where
the drug is legal, but those guidelines were rescinded by former
Attorney General Jeff Sessions last year.
Pointing
to the growing marijuana industry and investments in cannabis
companies, Barr said he didn't want to 'upset settled expectations.'
Personal view: Bill Barr, Trump's
pick to be attorney-general, said his own view was that marijuana should
be criminalized everywhere
'To the extent that
people are complying with the state laws, distribution and production
and so forth, we're not going to go after that,' Barr said.
Despite
his affirmation that he would not target cannabis businesses, Barr said
he would personally support a federal law that 'prohibits marijuana
everywhere.'
The largely hands-off
approach to marijuana enforcement set forth during former President
Barack Obama's administration allowed the marijuana industry to flourish
into a sophisticated, multimillion-dollar market that helps fund some
state government programs.
Days after
California's broad marijuana legalization went into effect, Sessions
rescinded the Justice Department's guidance - known as the Cole Memo -
and decried it as allowing a 'safe harbor' for marijuana by allowing
states to flout federal law.
Confirmation time: Bill Barr appeared Tuesday for his first day of Senate confirmation hearings and they continued Wednesday
'Backdoor nullification': Federal
law still prohibits the possession and sale of marijuana but the DoJ
adopts a hands off approach in states such as Washington where it is
legal under state law.
Since the guidance was rescinded, there has been concern about the future of the growing cannabis industry.
Despite
medical and so-called recreational cannabis legalization in dozens of
states, federal law prohibits the possession and sale of marijuana.
But
Barr said the current system is 'untenable' and 'almost like a backdoor
nullification of federal law.' He called for members of Congress to
come up with a way to handle marijuana enforcement across the U.S.
The
intervention on marijuana came on the first day of a confirmation
hearing overshadowed by Robert Mueller's special counsel prone.
Barr told senators he would resist pressure to ax Mueller, including from the president, unless there was good cause to do so.
Asked
if he would fire the special counsel – or if he would change Justice
Department regulations and then fire him if asked to do so by the
president without 'good cause,' Barr responded: 'I would not carry out
that instruction.'
He was pressed by
Delaware Democratic Sen. Chris Coons and multiple other lawmakers on how
he would handle Mueller, his longtime friend who President Trump has
accused of overseeing a 'witch hunt' against him.
'I don't believe Mr. Mueller would be involved in a witch hunt,' Barr said under questioning.
He
revealed he met with President Trump in June 2017 when the president
was seeking to expand his legal team, and who asked him at the time how
well he knew Mueller.
'I said Bob is a straight shooter and should be dealt with as such,' Barr said he told the president.
The
comments were among multiple markers of independence Barr put down
during the hearing, where he also praised fired Attorney Gen. Jeff
Sessions' decision to recuse from the Russia probe and praised deputy
attorney gen. Rod Rosenstein, another favore target of the president's.
He
also offered explanations for the unsolicited memo he sent to
Rosenstein arguing Mueller's probe was 'fatally misconceived' by going
after possible obstruction of justice by the president.
And
he refused to give Democrats commitments they sought repeatedly that he
would yield to ethics professionals if they advised him to recuse
himself from the Mueller probe.
'I'm not surrendering that responsibility. I'm not giving it away,' he said.
Asked
by Democratic Sen. Kamala Harris of California under what scenario he
would not follow the advice of career ethics officials, he said
curtly: ‘If I disagreed with them.’
But
on other matters, Barr told lawmakers he didn't need the high-level job
he has previously held, would not be 'bullied' by anyone, and stated
explicitly several instances of interference in prosecution that would
be improper or illegal.
Barr said the
president would violate his oath of office if he ordered the Justice
Department to take an action in which he had a 'stake.'
Barr
made that statement as part of a hypothetical example during his first
day of high-stakes testimony before the Senate Judiciary, when asked
about his views on executive power and whether the president could
intervene in political cases.
He made
the comments as on a day when he backed up his friend Mueller, and said
longtime Trump foil former Attorney Gen. Jeff Sessions was probably
right to recuse himself from the Russia probe.
But
he also repeatedly refused under questioning by Democrats to state that
he would relinquish powers he said were established in the office.
'I am not going to surrender the responsibilities that I have,' he said.
On
the president's powers, he said: 'The other category of cases –and
let's pick an easy bad example – would be if a member of the president's
family or a business associate or something was under investigation and
he tries to intervene.'
'He's the
chief law enforcement officer, and you could say well he has the power,
but that would be a breach of his obligation under the Constitution to
faithfully execute the laws,' Barr said.
'So
in my opinion, if a president attempts to intervene in a matter that he
has a stake in to protect himself – that should first be looked at as a
breach of his constitutional duties. Whether it also violates a statute
depending on what statute comes into play and what all the facts are,'
he said.
Such pronouncement would
ordinarily be boilerplate, but takes on extra significance while a probe
President Trump has labeled a 'witch hunt' continues to examine Trump
associates and family members who had contacts with Russians during the
campaign.
Barr spoke as Senate
Democrats pressed him on his views of the Mueller probe – including its
investigation of any obstruction of justice by Trump, something Barr has
criticized in writing.
Trump fired FBI
Director James Comey early in his term, and according to Comey asked if
he could relieve pressure on his former national security advisor Mike
Flynn.
No comments:
Post a Comment