According
to a recent study, motor vehicle crashes are up 6 percent in four
states that have legalized recreational marijuana compared with four
neighboring states where the drug is restricted or illegal.
The
study was conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
(IIHS) and Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI), which say the crash data
suggest that as more states legalize recreational marijuana, more effort
will be needed to determine how best to prevent impaired driving
crashes.
“What we’re seeing is a definite
increase in crash risk that is associated with the legalized
recreational use of marijuana,” says David Harkey, president of IIHS and
HLDI.
Harkey cautioned that the study results
indicate only a correlation between marijuana legalization and a higher
number of crashes, and says more research would be necessary to
determine whether marijuana use caused the increase.
Other
groups disagree with the findings. They point to surveys that seem to
contradict the conclusions. Experts and advocates interviewed for this
report say that more study is needed and that greater education around
driving impairment is a good idea.
The IIHS/HLDI
study compared insurance claims for vehicle collisions in Colorado,
Nevada, Oregon and Washington — where recreational marijuana is legal —
with Idaho, Montana, Utah and Wyoming — where it’s not, and controlled
for factors including driver age and employment status, seasonality,
weather and location.
Paul Armentano, deputy
director of National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, an
advocacy group that works toward the legalization of recreational
marijuana, said he was doubtful of the findings.
“I
am skeptical that legal marijuana is the variable here that is solely
responsible for the difference in these states versus controls, or that
investigators could have definitively identified cannabis as a factor
absent other potential confounders,” he told Consumer Reports. He
pointed to demographic differences that may not be controlled for — such
as tourism, population density and number of cars on the road — that he
says call the findings into question.
Additionally,
Armentano cited similar research that does not show a correlation
between marijuana legalization and motor vehicle crash fatalities. That
research includes a July 2017 study published in the American Journal of
Public Health, which found no statistically significant difference in
changes in motor vehicle crash fatality rates for Washington and
Colorado after recreational marijuana legalization, compared with
similar states where recreational marijuana is not legal.
“Even
if one is to take claims regarding a slight uptick in traffic
collisions at face value, this has not translated into a parallel uptick
in fatal traffic crashes,” Armentano says.
Although
more research may be needed to determine the effects of marijuana
legalization on motor vehicle safety, Harkey says that more education is
needed to alert drivers to the dangers of impairment.
“Impairment
is impairment, whether it’s alcohol or marijuana or prescription
drugs,” he says. “Any of those can affect your ability to drive a motor
vehicle. You shouldn’t be behind the wheel if you’re impaired by any
substance. That’s a message that I’m not sure is currently clearly
conveyed.”
Indeed, IIHS found that drivers are
largely unaware of the risks of using marijuana while driving.
“There is
lack of understanding about impairment risk, or impairment and driving
risk, with respect to marijuana,” Harkey said. Additionally, roadside
surveys of drivers in Washington show that marijuana-impaired drivers
are more likely to have children in the car and are more likely to be
driving during the day than alcohol-impaired drivers, IIHS said.
Another
issue is the complexity of how THC, the psychoactive component of
cannabis, affects driving. “Impaired driving remains a major factor in
the number of motor vehicle crashes on our roads,” says Jennifer
Stockburger, director of operations at Consumer Reports’ Auto Test
Center.
“But with marijuana, unlike alcohol, the level of driver
impairment is difficult to evaluate.”
Unlike
alcohol, the presence of THC in the body does not necessarily mean that
an individual is impaired, and a higher level of marijuana use does not
necessarily mean greater impairment.
Different forms of THC-containing
products affect the body in different ways. That makes it more difficult
for researchers and law enforcement alike to determine impairment
levels.
Marijuana-impaired drivers are more likely to be impaired by
alcohol as well, IIHS says, which further complicates efforts to study
the problem.
“We’re going to need more research
and more help from the medical community, from medical researchers, to
help us understand different products with different levels of THC, how
different individuals are affected by that, how that relates to
impairment, and ultimately how that relates to the ability to drive a
vehicle and a potential crash risk,” Harkey says.
A
growing number of states are allowing some form of marijuana use. In
addition to the states involved in the study, five states allow
recreational use of marijuana as well as medical marijuana, more than 20
states allow medical marijuana, and more than a dozen states allow the
use of certain cannabis products for medical use. Legalization
initiatives are pending in multiple states, and Canada became the second
country to legalize recreational marijuana in October. U.S. federal law
still considers marijuana illegal to possess, use or sell.
Harkey
says that road-safety advocates must now work with the marijuana
industry in addition to the medical community, public-health researchers
and law enforcement to reduce the number of crashes related to impaired
driving.
“Are there ways we can work with the
marijuana industry to try and educate the consumers and educate the
public? I think these are questions for public health agencies to help
us figure out,” Harkey says. He also suggests using additional tax
revenue derived from marijuana sales to fund road-safety initiatives.
No comments:
Post a Comment