Monday, 13 February 2017

Health impacts of pot use are not good

Ron Fink

Proponents of recreational pot use are giddy over the prospect of being able to legally grow their own. Some of these folks are old enough to know better, but after all it’s the cause that’s important, not the long-term health and safety impacts that count.
The National Institute of Drug Abuse and the Office of National Drug Control Policy say, “Marijuana smoke irritates the lungs, and frequent marijuana smokers can have the same breathing problems that tobacco smokers have. These problems include daily cough and phlegm, more frequent lung illness, and a higher risk of lung infections; increased risk of both brain and behavioral problems in babies; temporary hallucinations, paranoia and worsening symptoms in patients with schizophrenia.”
They also say, “Compared to nonusers, heavy marijuana users more often report lower life satisfaction, poorer mental and physical health, more relationship problems and less academic and career success …”
None of this sounds healthy to me.
A University of California San Francisco News Center report by Leigh Beeson last July concerning second-hand pot smoke states, “One minute of exposure to second-hand smoke from marijuana diminishes blood vessel function to the same extent as tobacco, but the harmful cardiovascular effects last three times longer, according to a new study in rats led by UC San Francisco researchers.”
So, even though you and I and the children of users may not use pot, we are subject to some serious ill effects just by being in proximity to a user for a minute or more.
Initially, pot users experience near-instant gratification as they puff away. But, over time they build up a tolerance that relies on increased usage to obtain the same high.
The Office of National Drug Control Policy reports, “prevalence of higher-potency marijuana, measured by levels of the chemical delta¬9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), is increasing. Average THC levels rose from less than 1 percent in the mid-1970s to more than 6 percent in 2002.
Sinsemilla potency increased in the past two decades from 6 percent to more than 13 percent, with some samples containing THC levels of up to 33 percent.”
I would say these institutions have a high degree of credibility. On the other hand, pot bloggers produce information that doesn’t sync with the available clinical evidence. You should decide which to believe.
The established impairment level in Colorado is five nanograms of active THC per milliliter of whole blood. Unlike alcohol, pot use can be detected for up to 100 days. Keep that in mind the next time you take a mandatory drug test for work, commercial drivers exams or a pre-employment physical.
Lompoc is currently trying to figure out what to do about recreational marijuana growing and use in the city. Even though neither Santa Barbara County nor the state have figured out what to do yet, our elected leaders decided to plunge headlong into an effort to regulate this substance before the pot laws had been established.
So, there are two basic questions — do city leaders want to condone an increased risk to public health, or will they execute their responsibility to protect the public and continue the ban on marijuana use in our city?
Responsible leadership is needed here. Even though political pressure will be exerted to assure leaders they should approve this quickly, they must sift through the fog of pot supporters’ rhetoric and make decisions that serve the public good.
In this case, waiting until the state/county acts is the best course of action.

No comments: