Friday 5 August 2016

The environmental downside of recreational marijuana

By Tom Walsh



















Maine voters will decide this fall whether marijuana will become the state’s newest recreational intoxicant of choice, which could put a huge dent in retail sales of Allen’s Coffee Brandy.

Voter approval of Maine’s wacky weed ballot referendum also could jumpstart the emergence of a new industry in Maine: marijuana cultivation, creating new jobs that offer workers a new take on “high” wages. Or not.

The same prohibitive costs of doing business that have driven industries out of Maine and have made the state an unattractive place to establish a new business or to expand an existing business would also impact marijuana production, particularly Maine’s high cost of electricity.

Marijuana may be a weed, but cultivation of strains of pot that pack a hefty dose of THC, the plant’s psychotropic component, is an indoor undertaking. It’s a botanical labor of love, a process requiring a lot of electricity to power high-intensity grow lights and critical climate control technologies.

Marijuana cultivation is not environmentally friendly, given the huge reliance on fossil fuels to generate electricity, both nationally and in Maine, where generation relies heavily upon natural gas.

A recent analysis by Gina Warren, who teaches energy law and policy at the University of Houston Law Center, claims that indoor marijuana cultivation is one of the most energy-intensive industries in the United States, with annual energy costs amounting to nearly $6 billion.

Another study estimates that growing marijuana indoors requires 5,000 kilowatt hours of electricity for every kilogram — 2.2 pounds — of marijuana produced. By comparison, Warren notes, the production of aluminum requires about 16 kilowatt hours per kilogram.

Recreational use of marijuana is now legal in Alaska, Colorado, Oregon and Washington and in the District of Columbia, although many more states — Maine among them — have authorized the use of medical marijuana. Legalizing recreational pot will be a ballot issue this fall in Maine, California and Nevada.

Much of Warren’s analysis focuses on Colorado, where recreational pot has been legal since 2014. Last year the state’s marijuana industry generated nearly $1 billion in sales, up 42 percent from the year before. Her study also shows that a 5,000-square-foot indoor marijuana facility consumes six times more electricity than an average commercial business and 49 times more electricity than the average Colorado residence.

Demand for electricity is increasing in Denver by 1.2 percent a year, with marijuana production accounting for nearly half of that increase.

Warren points out that the energy issues created in Colorado are indicative of marijuana cultivation’s hardly benign impact on efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that exacerbate global warming.

Coal provides more than 60 percent of the fuel being burned by Colorado’s electrical generating stations, with natural gas providing another 22 percent. It’s estimated that indoor marijuana cultivation nationally accounts for nearly 15 million metric tons of carbon emissions annually, more than the annual energy-related CO2 emissions of Delaware, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont and the District of Columbia.

Should marijuana cultivation emerge as a new industry in Maine, the energy costs involved will be substantial. In Colorado, industrial users now pay 6.8 cents per kilowatt hour, significantly less than the 8.3 cents now being charged to Maine’s industrial customers.

Rates for commercial customers now run 9.6 cents in Colorado and 12.3 cents in Maine. How pot farmers in Maine would find themselves classified as ratepayers is among the unknowns inherent in legalization.

“The best time to address impacts … is before they occur, not after a major industry is already established,” Warren says. “Marijuana production is rapidly developing into an extremely lucrative industry that can afford to manage its impacts on the environment.”

No comments: