Tuesday 16 December 2014

Medical marijuana users score another win in court


The federal government has lost another round in a legal battle over whether medical marijuana users can continue to grow their own pot in their homes.
The Federal Court of Appeal today rejected the government's appeal of a March 21 court injunction that has temporarily allowed previously authorized medical marijuana patients to continue growing their own, or have pot grown for them, despite new federal regulations that outlawed home grows as of April.

A full trial on the constitutional challenge lodged by various medical marijuana patients is slated to begin Feb. 23 now that the court injunction has been upheld, Abbotsford lawyer John Conroy said.
The appeal ruling also requires the court to clarify the status of some patients who were left out of the injunction because their authorizations weren't valid at the time it was issued.

Conroy said he's optimistic about the trial but isn't reading too much into the latest ruling, which keeps a continued legal cloud over the new federal system of medical pot being provided only through licensed commercial producers.
"It is an indication that a judge looked at the facts and decided if we did not have an injunction people would suffer irreparable harm," Conroy said. "But the trial judge gets to revisit the whole situation."

An estimated 11,500  B.C. medical marijuana grow operations were legally being run by or on behalf of federally licensed users when the injunction was granted last March.
Other legal actions are also pending on behalf of medical marijuana users, including one that seeks a court order that medical marijuana users are entitled to obtain their cannabis in the form of oil or other extracts, not just the dried bud that is the only form allowed under the new mail-order production system.


Luxury French Lingerie
http://tinyurl.com/o7qcz7m

From chocolate eggs to chocolate coins, give your sweet tooth a treat with our delicious products.
http://tinyurl.com/nragc9j

Saturday 13 December 2014

Up until now, US President Barack Obama had made little to no comments regarding the legalization of marijuana in two states of the Union; however, as Congress attempts to interfere, Obama's DC pot opinion prevails: he thinks the legislative body should stand down in the face of the legalized bill.
After the success of the bill that made Colorado the first state in the US to legalize cannabis as a recreational habit beyond medical use, Obama's DC pot stand becomes clear in the midst of a Congressional battle to stop the legislation: the will of the people of the District of Columbia should be respected.

According to ABC News, the latest Obama DC pot update says that the US president approves of the recreational use of the drug, as it was approved to be legalized in the state in a referendum last November, though further measures regarding this topic have been stopped by the United States Congress.
"We do not believe that Congress should spend a lot of time interfering with the ability of the citizens of the District of Columbia to make decisions related to how they should govern their community," said Josh Earnest, a White House representative, to Jonathan Karl earlier this week.

According to The Hill, the Obama DC pot statement came last Thursday, after the Congress has interfered in the DC law, blocking the recently approved legalization. When asked directly whether the president supported the general legalization of cannabis, Earnest replied that, since the people of the District of Columbia had voted yes on the ballot last November, the president believed that "on principle" their opinion regarding it should not be ruled out.

According to The Washington Times, the issue that drove Obama's DC pot statement was that Congress Republicans have intended to block the approve legalization by inserting a budget rider in the spending plan, which would prevent the city from spending its own money for legislation to loosen drug penalties - or, in this case, abolish them entirely.


Luxury French Lingerie
http://tinyurl.com/o7qcz7m

From chocolate eggs to chocolate coins, give your sweet tooth a treat with our delicious products.
http://tinyurl.com/nragc9j


The Secret History of Cannabis in Japan

Today Japan has some of the strictest anti-cannabis laws in the world.
Punishment for possession is a maximum 5 years behind bars and illicit growers face 7-year sentences. Annually around 2000 people fall foul of these laws - their names splashed on the nightly news and their careers ruined forever. The same prohibition that dishes out these punishments also bans research into medical marijuana, forcing Japanese scientists overseas to conduct their studies.

For decades, these laws have stood unchallenged. But now increasing numbers of Japanese people are speaking out against prohibition - and at the heart of their campaign is an attempt to teach the public about Japan's long-forgotten history of cannabis.
"Most Japanese people see cannabis as a subculture of Japan but they're wrong. For thousands of years cannabis has been at the very heart of Japanese culture," explains Takayasu Junichi, one of the country's leading experts.

According to Takayasu, the earliest traces of cannabis in Japan are seeds and woven fibers discovered in the west of the country dating back to the Jomon Period (10,000 BC - 300 BC). Archaeologists suggest that cannabis fibers were used for clothes - as well as for bow strings and fishing lines. These plants were likely cannabis sativa - prized for its strong fibers - a thesis supported by a Japanese prehistoric cave painting which appears to show a tall spindly plant with cannabis's tell-tale leaves.

"Cannabis was the most important substance for prehistoric people in Japan. But today many Japanese people have a very negative image of the plant," says Takayasu.
In order to put Japanese people back in touch with their cannabis roots, in 2001 Takayasu founded Taima Hakubutsukan (The Cannabis Museum) - the only museum in Japan dedicated to the much-maligned weed.2
The museum is located in a log cabin 100 miles from Tokyo in Tochigi Prefecture - an area long-associated with Japanese cannabis farming. The prefecture borders the Tohoku region which was devastated by the March 11, 2011 earthquake - but being inland from the tsunami and shielded by mountains from radioactive fall-out, it largely escaped the effects of the disaster

The museum is packed with testimony to Japan's proud cannabis heritage. There are 17th century woodblock prints of women spinning fibers and photos of farmers cutting plants. In one corner sits a working loom where Takayasu demonstrates the art of weaving. He points to a bail of cannabis cloth - warm in winter, cool in summer, it's perfectly suited to Japan's extreme climate.
"Until the middle of the twentieth century, Japanese cannabis farming used to be a year-round cycle," explains Takayasu. "The seeds were planted in spring then harvested in the summer. Following this, the stalks were dried then soaked and turned into fiber. Throughout the winter, these were then woven into cloth and made into clothes ready to wear for the next planting season."

Playing such a key role in agriculture, cannabis often appeared in popular culture. It is mentioned in the 8th century Manyoshu - Japan's oldest collection of poems and features in many haiku and tanka poems. Ninjas purportedly used cannabis in their training - leaping daily over the fast-growing plants to hone their acrobatic skills.
According to Takayasu, cannabis was so renowned for growing tall and strong that there was a Japanese proverb related to positive peer pressure which stated that even gnarly weeds would straighten if grown among cannabis plants.

In a similar way, school songs in cannabis-growing communities often exhorted pupils to grow as straight and tall as cannabis plants. Due to these perceived qualities, a fabric design called Asa-no-ha based upon interlocking cannabis leaves became popular in the 18th century. The design was a favorite choice for children's clothes and also became fashionable among merchants hoping for a boom in their economic fortunes.

Accompanying these material uses, cannabis also bore spiritual significance in Shintoism, Japan's indigenous religion, which venerates natural harmony and notions of purity. Cannabis was revered for its cleansing abilities so Shinto priests used to wave bundles of leaves to exorcise evil spirits. Likewise, to signify their purity, brides wore veils made from cannabis on their wedding days. Today, the nation's most sacred shrine - Ise Jingu in Mie Prefecture - continues to have five annual ceremonies called taima dedicated to the nation's sun goddess. However many modern visitors fail to connect the names of these rituals with the drug so demonized by their politicians and police.

Early 20th century American historian George Foot Moore also recorded how Japanese travelers used to present small offerings of cannabis leaves at roadside shrines to ensure safe journeys. Families, too, burned bunches of cannabis in their doorways to welcome back the spirits of the dead during the summer obon festival.
Given this plethora of evidence that cannabis was essential in so many aspects of Japanese life, one question remains in doubt: Was it smoked?

Takayasu isn't sure - and nor are many other experts. Historical archives make no mention of cannabis smoking in Japan but these records tends to focus primarily on the lifestyles of the elite and ignore the habits of the majority of the population. For hundreds of years, Japanese society used to be stratified into a strict class system. Within this hierarchy, rice - and the sake wine brewed from it - was controlled by the rich, so cannabis may well have been the drug of choice for the masses.

Equally as important as whether cannabis was smoked is the question of could it have been? The answer to that is a clear yes. According to a 1973 survey published by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, THC levels of indigenous Japanese cannabis plants from Tochigi measured almost 4%. In comparison, one study conducted by the University of Mississippi's Marijuana Potency Monitoring Project found average THC levels in marijuana seized by U.S. authorities in the 1970s at a much lower 1.5%.

Until the early 20th century, cannabis-based cures were available from Japanese drug stores. Long an ingredient in traditional Chinese medicine, they were taken to relieve muscle aches, pain and insomnia.
Meanwhile the Tohoku region was renowned for wild wariai kinoko (laughing mushrooms). In a country in love with its fungi - think shiitake, maitake and thousand-dollar matsutake - the sale of a range of psychedelic mushrooms was legal until 2002 when they were prohibited to improve the country's international image prior to the Japan-South Korea World Cup.

The prohibition against the Japanese cannabis industry also has a foreign origin.
According to Takayasu, the 1940s started well for cannabis farmers as the nation's military leaders - like those in the U.S. - urged farmers to plant cannabis to help win the Asia-Pacific War.
"The Imperial navy needed it for ropes and the air force for parachute cords. The military categorized cannabis as a war material and they created patriotic war slogans about it. There was even a saying that without cannabis, the war couldn't be waged," says Takayasu.

However after Japan's surrender in 1945, U.S. authorities occupied the country and they introduced American attitudes towards cannabis. Having effectively prohibited its cultivation in the States in 1937, Washington now sought to ban it in Japan. With the nation still under U.S. control, it passed the 1948 Cannabis Control Act. The law criminalized possession and unlicensed cultivation - and more than 60 years later, it remains at the core of Japan's current anti-cannabis policy.

At the time, the U.S. authorities appear to have passed off the Act as an altruistic desire to protect Japanese people from the evils of drugs. But critics point out that occupation authorities allowed the sale of over-the-counter amphetamines to continue until 1951. Instead, several Japanese experts contend that the ban was instigated by U.S. petrochemical lobbyists who wanted to overturn the Japanese cannabis fiber industry and open the market to American-made artificial materials, including nylon.

Takayasu sees the ban in a different light, situating it within the wider context of U.S. attempts to reduce the power of Japanese militarists who had dragged Asia into war.
"In the same way the U.S. authorities discouraged martial arts such as kendo and judo, the 1948 Cannabis Control Act was a way to undermine militarism in Japan. The wartime cannabis industry had been so dominated by the military that the new law was designed to strip away its power."

Regardless of the true reasons, the impact of the 1948 Cannabis Control Act was devastating. From a peak of more than 25,000 cannabis farms in 1948, the numbers quickly plummeted - forcing farmers out of business and driving the knowledge of cannabis cultivation to the brink of extinction. Today there are fewer than 60 licensed cannabis farms in Japan - all required to grow strains of cannabis containing minimal levels of THC - and only one survivor versed in the full cannabis cycle of seed-to-loom - an 84 year-old woman.
Simultaneously, a sustained propaganda campaign has cleaved the Japanese public from their cannabis cultural roots - brainwashing them into perceiving marijuana as a poison on a par with heroin or crack cocaine.

These campaigns might have stamped out all traces of Japan's millennia-long history were it not for one factor - the resilience of the cannabis plants themselves. Every summer millions of these bushes - the feral offspring of cannabis legally cultivated before 1948 - pop up in the hills and plains of rural Japan. In 2006, 300 plants even sprouted in the grounds of Abashiri Prison in Hokkaido - much to the embarrassment of the powers-that-be.

Every year, the Japanese police wage well-publicized eradication campaigns against these plants. On average, they discover and destroy between one and two million of them. But like so many other aspects of the drug war, theirs is a losing battle and the next year, the plants grow back in larger numbers than ever.
Due to the taboos surrounding discussions of cannabis, many people had been reluctant to condemn these police campaigns. But now critics are beginning to attack both the waste of public resources and the needless destruction of such versatile plants.

Nagayoshi Hideo, author of the 2009 book, Taima Nyuumon - An Introduction to Cannabis - argues for the wild cannabis plants to be systematically harvested and put to use as medicines, biomass energy and in the construction industries.
Funai Yukio - another advocate and author of Akuhou! Taima Torishimarihou no Shinjitsu - Bad Law! The Truth Behind the Cannabis Control Act (2012) - calls cannabis a golden egg for Japan. In a detailed breakdown of the potential economic benefits of legalization, he factors in savings from reduced policing and incarceration - concluding the country could reap as much as 300 billion dollars in the long term.

In a nation facing unprecedented economic problems, and at a time when marijuana legalization is advancing in the United States and other countries, it appears these arguments are striking a chord. Recently Japan slipped behind China as the world's third economic power and the country owes more than ten trillion dollars in debt - double its GDP. These problems contribute to the human toll of an estimated 6.5 million alcoholics and a suicide rate that hovers at around 30,000 a year.

The legalization of cannabis could solve some of these problems. By luring young entrepreneurs back to the land, it could counter agricultural decline - particularly in post-earthquake Tohoku. It might improve the quality of care for thousands of cancer patients and halt the brain drain of scientists forced overseas to research medical cannabis. Legalization would also prevent the annual arrests of 2000 Japanese people - many in their 20s and 30s - whose lives are destroyed by their nation's illogical and ahistorical laws.
In years to come, Taima Hakubutsukan might be seen as a true beachhead in this struggle.

"People need to learn the truth about the history of cannabis in Japan," says Takayasu. "The more we learn about the past, the more hints we might be able to get about how to live better in the future. Cannabis can offer Japan a beacon of hope."

Cannabis: What's in a name?
Botanists usually divide the cannabis family into three broad categories - tall cannabis sativa, bushy cannabis indica and small cannabis ruderalis. However this simple taxonomy is often frustrated in practice by the interfertility of these three types, which allows them to be crossbred into limitless new varieties.
The desired properties of these hybrids tend to determine the name by which they are commonly known.
Marijuana, for example, usually refers to cannabis plants that are grown for ingestion for medical or recreational uses. Cannabis sativa is said to give users a feeling of energetic euphoria and can be prescribed for depression, whereas cannabis indica is apparently more sedating so can be used as a muscle relaxant or to treat chronic pain.

Hemp, is the name often applied to tall plants from the cannabis sativa category which are primarily grown for their strong fibres - but may also contain significant levels of THC.
Most recently, the term industrial hemp has been coined in the U.S. to refer to cannabis plants which have been specially-bred to contain very low levels of THC (less than 1%) in order to conform to current drug laws. Today, many of Japan's licensed cannabis farms grow a low-THC strain called Tochigi shiro which was first developed in the post-War period.


Luxury French Lingerie
http://tinyurl.com/o7qcz7m

From chocolate eggs to chocolate coins, give your sweet tooth a treat with our delicious products.
http://tinyurl.com/nragc9j

Friday 12 December 2014

Why People Are Eating Mangoes Before Smoking Marijuana


It may be time to skin some mangoes marijuana lovers, not for the fruity flavour and Vitamin C, but for the apparent ability of the fruit to heighten the effects of THC. Yellow mangoes and green bud apparently combine when consumed in succession, as described by Alternet.org, but before you buy a bundle mangoes, you may want to get the facts.

According to partakers of the new trend, eating a mango within an hour of smoking marijuana will speed up a body’s THC-absorption rate while also strengthening the psychoactive effects of THC and the overall duration. Claims have been made stating THC will reach the brain twice as fast with effects lasting twice as long after eating a mango.

Mangoes and weed are said to go hand in hand thanks to myrcene terpenes, a chemical compound found in both that is responsible for each substance’s strong fragrance, and is also said to influence the effects of THC. Ingesting the myrcene terpenes within a mango creates a “foundation” within one’s body, and when coupled with the myrcene in cannabis, leads to more powerful smoking experience.

Sounds a little too good to be true, and that’s probably because it is. We spoke to Adam Greenblatt, Executive Director of Santé Cannabis, Montreal’s first and only medical marijuana clinic. Greenblatt pointed out that any “study” such as this should be taken with a grain of salt, then went on to confirm the mango-marijuana combo “is just not true.”

Other researchers support Greenblatt’s opinion. Michael Backes, author of Cannabis Pharmacy: The Practical Guide to Medical Marijuana points out to Dangerous Minds that, while myrcene can positvely influence the effects of THC, a human can’t really absorb the compound simply by eating a mango. Myrcene, is a type of terpene, which is kind of like a natural pesticide, and humans evolved in a way to filter out such compounds, meaning next to no myrcene will actually enter your bloodstream post-mango.

So it seems like the mango theory is mostly just rumour and hearsay. Still, you could try yourself, and hey, maybe the placebo effect will be enough to make a marked difference in your smoking experience.


Luxury French Lingerie
http://tinyurl.com/o7qcz7m

From chocolate eggs to chocolate coins, give your sweet tooth a treat with our delicious products.
http://tinyurl.com/nragc9j

Legalized marijuana: Let’s examine the facts


Today’s society is bombarded with information from many sources; these sources of information often have conflicting data and differing points of view. This could not be truer than in the discussions regarding legalized marijuana.
In the Dec. 3, Arizona Capitol Times article titled “Teenagers at ground zero in Arizona’s marijuana battlefield,” J.P. Holyoak, a medical marijuana dispensary owner and president of the Arizona Dispensary Association, commented on the November 18 “Marijuana: The Science and the Experiment” Conference.

He was quoted as saying, “I saw a lot of statistical manipulation, half-truths and reefer madness.” My sincere hope is that on the topic of legalized marijuana, citizens of Arizona will examine who truly is utilizing “statistical manipulations and half-truths” and that they review the validity and sources of all information that is presented.
At the Nov. 18 conference, neuroscientist Dr. Stephen Dewey presented facts from scientific research on the effects of marijuana on the brain. He displayed actual brain images of marijuana users showing adverse changes in brain matter. One study that Dr. Dewey discussed confirmed that long-term, consistent marijuana use decreases the user’s IQ.

Also presenting was Mr. Tom Gorman, executive director of the Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA). Director Gorman presented statistical information from Colorado showing the impact that legalized and medicinal marijuana have had on the state. His sources of information include the Colorado Department of Transportation, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, and the Colorado Department of Revenue.

He presented facts showing the increase in overall crime in Denver; the increase in drivers testing positive for marijuana; the increase in traffic fatalities with marijuana-positive drivers; the increase in marijuana-related school suspensions; the increase in emergency department visits related to marijuana; the increase in marijuana diversion; the increase in marijuana use; and the increase in marijuana-related exposures in children. True science and true facts from reliable sources were presented, not “statistical manipulation and half-truths.”

I encourage individuals to look at some of the half-truths from the pro-legalization groups. Common messages are: “Our prisons are full of people convicted of simple marijuana possession;” “Marijuana is not addictive;” “Legal marijuana will stop the drug cartels;” and “Legal marijuana will be the solution to funding education.”

Let’s look at the facts:
• According to the National Office of Drug Control Policy, “Less than 1.4 percent of prisoners are in prison for marijuana drug offense only. Others are criminals guilty of trafficking, growing, manufacturing, selling, or distributing — convicted of multiple offenses that include a marijuana charge.” In Arizona the percentage is even lower than this national statistic. Arizona state law does not allow a prison sentence for marijuana possession until the third offense.

• According to the National Institute of Drug Abuse, marijuana is an addictive substance. Research shows that one in six youths who try marijuana will become addicted and for daily marijuana users the addiction rate is 25 percent to 50 percent.

• According to the Rocky Mountain HIDTA report, black market sales, growing operations, drug cartels, and illegal drug trafficking are still exploding problems in Colorado. Legalizing another drug will not make drug cartels go away.

When it comes to the topic of raising money for our schools, I shake my head in bewilderment. What sense does it make to legalize a third addictive substance that will cause increased destruction and harm to children, families and education and justify it by claiming it will raise money for our schools? According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, current alcohol tax revenues cover less than 10 percent of alcohol-related costs which equal $223.5 billion annually in health care, criminal justice and workplace lost productivity. Do we truly believe this will be any different for marijuana?
Please check the information and the sources of these facts for yourself. The goal of “Marijuana Harmless? Think Again!” is to educate the residents of Arizona on the true harms of marijuana. Our goal is not to make money or to be able to legally get high from a drug. Our goal is to protect the children of Arizona and the future of this great state.


Luxury French Lingerie
http://tinyurl.com/o7qcz7m

From chocolate eggs to chocolate coins, give your sweet tooth a treat with our delicious products.
http://tinyurl.com/nragc9j

Thursday 20 November 2014

Bob Marley marijuana brand to debut




More than 33 years after he died of cancer, Jamaican reggae music legend Bob Marley is getting ready to stir things up posthumously , if not lively up the surging commercial marijuana market, as the name and face of what is being billed as the world's first international marijuana brand.
Marley Natural, which is described as "heirloom Jamaican cannabis strains,” is targeted to ship before the end of 2015 to sales outlets in countries where pot is legal. To help ensure a big roll-out, Marley Natural products will be packaged and marketed with input from the same P.R. agency that played a key role in branding Starbucks Coffee and New Balance running shoes. A Marley Natural slogan, "Make way for the positive day," has already been introduced.

At least one of Bob Marley's quotes – "When you smoke the herb it reveals you to yourself" – is also being used in the marketing campaign for Marley Natural. Members of the deceased reggae singer-songwriter's family announced Marley Natural on Tuesday morning's edition of the TV show NBC Today.

Introducing Marley Natural Fine Cannabis

An accompanying video, narrated by an unidentified woman and featuring Marley's classic songs "One Love" and "Could You Be Loved," proclaims that Marley Natural is "inspired by a deep respect for nature, for its power to awaken our well-being, we embark on a new chapter of his legacy to realize more fully the benefits of cannabis for the mind, body and spirit. Make way for the positive day." 

The video makes no mention of Bob Marley having been, as many Jamaicans and reggae artists are to this day, a devout Rastarfarian. The monotheistic Rastafari religious movement regards marijuana as a “sacrament” and contends its use is, in fact, sanctioned by the Bible.
How so? Rastafarians point to a line in Psalms 104:14: “He causes the grass to grow for the cattle, and herb for the service of man.” The video also omits any mention of the fact Marley reportedly smoked nearly a pound of pot per week.

Marley Natural is the brainchild of the Seattle-based private equity company Privateer Holdings, which exclusively focuses on marijuana industry products and investments. Marley Natural will also sell an array of other pot-related products, including marijuana creams, lotions and various accessories, such as e-cigarette-styled vaporizers, inspired by both Marley and marijuana.
In a taped video statement provided to NBC News, Cedella Marley, 47, Bob's first-born daughter, said: "It just seems natural that Daddy should be part of this conversation. As Daddy would say: 'Make way for the positive day'."

The video also includes Rohan Marley, 42, one of Bob and Rita Marley's sons. "Herb is for the healing of the nation," he said. "Herb is for the meditation; herb is for the higher vibrations."
Cedella and Rohan's mother, Rita Marley, agrees, saying: “My husband believed ‘the herb’ was a natural and positive part of life, and he felt it was important to the world. He looked forward to this day.”
Apparently, Marley also looked forward to more widespread marijuana cultivation and sales.

A statement posted Tuesday morning on his website reads: "As a brand with a strong social conscience, Marley Natural’s business model and philanthropic initiatives will be built to ensure that families and communities who have been harmed by prohibition have the opportunity to benefit from the new, legal cannabis economy."
The Marley estate earned an estimated $20 million over the past year, according to a Forbes magazine tally published last month. Those pre-Marley Natural earnings could now grow significantly higher.

The launch of Marley Natural is the latest example of how what is becoming known as "canna-business" is taking off in a big way.
Four states – Alaska, Colorado, Oregon and Washington – plus the District of Columbia allow pot to be sold for recreational purposes. In September alone, taxes on pot products legally sold in Colorado brought more than $26 million to the state's coffers. 

Meanwhile, the use of pot has been decriminalized in 23 other states. Medical marijuana is legal in California, although the proliferation of pot dispensaries remains contentious in many cities in the state, including San Diego.
Coming next week (well, maybe): Former members of the Grateful Dead and a slew of hip-hop stars jostle to be the first U.S. music to announce their own line of pot products.


Luxury French Lingerie
http://tinyurl.com/o7qcz7m

From chocolate eggs to chocolate coins, give your sweet tooth a treat with our delicious products.
http://tinyurl.com/nragc9j


Marijuana Drastically Shrinks Aggressive Form Of Brain Cancer, New Study Finds

Over the past few years, research has revealed that marijuana can both destroy certain cancer cells and reduce the growth of others. Now, a new study in mice has found that when combined with radiation treatment, cannabis can effectively shrink one of the most aggressive types of brain tumors.
In a paper published Friday in the journal Molecular Cancer Therapies, a team of researchers from St. George's University of London outlined the "dramatic reductions" they observed in high-grade glioma masses, a deadly form of brain cancer, when treated with a combination of radiation and two different marijuana compounds, also known as cannabinoids. In many cases, those tumors shrunk to as low as one-tenth the sizes of those in the control group.

"We've shown that cannabinoids could play a role in treating one of the most aggressive cancers in adults," Dr. Wai Liu, one of the study's lead authors, wrote in an op-ed earlier this week. "The results are promising...it could provide a way of breaking through glioma and saving more lives."

In an email to The Huffington Post, Liu pointed out that while research surrounding marijuana's cancer-fighting properties is nothing new, his team is the first to document its effect on the disease when used alongside radiation. "The results showed that the final effect was superior to the sum of the parts," he said. "Hopefully, these results will support calls for formal trials in humans to test these combinations."

Liu and his colleagues examined mice that had been infected with glioma and subsequently treated with radiation alone or in combination with varying levels of two cannabis compounds: THC, the psychoactive compound associated with the "high" sensation, and CBD, which doesn't produce psychoactive side effects.
They found that the tumors were best treated by low doses of both THC and CBD that, when used in concert, made the tumors more receptive to radiation treatment. "Our data suggests a 'triple threat' approach using all three may be of value," Liu told HuffPost.

The researchers also found that together, the low doses of THC and CBD produced a similar effect to a large dose of either compound, which is noteworthy because it indicates that patients may ultimately experience fewer side effects.
THC and CBD are just two of the dozens of chemical compounds found in the cannabis plant. While research surrounding the therapeutic effects of these compounds has been limited, a team of scientists from the U.K. last year found that a combination of six different purified cannabinoids can kill the cancerous cells found in individuals with leukemia.

Meanwhile, when used alone as a form of treatment, THC has been shown to reduce the size of other cancerous tumors and stop the spread of HIV, and CBD strains of marijuana have had a profound effect on children and adults who suffer from debilitating seizure disorders.
Despite these findings, marijuana is still classified as a Schedule I drug in the United States, meaning the federal government believes it has no medicinal value.

The federally-funded National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) grows a limited supply of marijuana in Mississippi, which is used for government sanctioned research. While critics have long accused NIDA of only funding experiments that examine the substance's negative effects, the agency has conducted a handful of studies that look at its potential benefits.

Although 23 states and the District of Columbia have legalized marijuana for medicinal purposes, many experts argue that the lack of federally regulated studies of cannabis limits doctors' and scientists' understanding of the full medical benefits of the plant, resulting instead in a trial-and-error attitude towards treatment.
"You can find publications from the '70s and '80s that show pure cannabidiol is an anti-convulsant," Catherine Jacobson, the director of research at the Epilepsy Foundation, told HuffPost last month. "And here we are 40 years later and we still don't have any new information about this."

Luxury French Lingerie
http://tinyurl.com/o7qcz7m

From chocolate eggs to chocolate coins, give your sweet tooth a treat with our delicious products.
http://tinyurl.com/nragc9j

Wednesday 12 November 2014

Legalize it? More states approve recreational marijuana use

By Jasmin Rojas,
The recent elections certainly saw a great deal of change across the country. Significantly, voters in two states—Oregon and Alaska—and in the District of Columbia have approved the use of recreational marijuana. They join Colorado and Washington, both states that have already passed similar laws.

Luxury French Lingerie
http://tinyurl.com/o7qcz7m


From chocolate eggs to chocolate coins, give your sweet tooth a treat with our delicious products.
http://tinyurl.com/nragc9j
Oregon’s ballot initiative allows adults 21 and older to possess up to eight ounces and four plants of marijuana. It also legalizes production and sales, which the Oregon Liquor Control Commission will regulate. The measure taxes marijuana, with the revenue set aside for enforcement and education programs.
Alaska’s law allows adults 21 and older to possess up to one ounce of pot and maintain six marijuana plants. The measure legalizes production and sales, which the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board—or a Marijuana Control Board, if one is created—will regulate. The measure also taxes marijuana.

The ballot initiative in the District of Columbia allows adults 21 and older to possess up to two ounces of marijuana for personal use, grow up to six plants, and give marijuana to other adults 21 and older. It doesn’t legalize, regulate, or tax sales.
Oregon’s law takes effect on July 1, 2015, and Alaska’s law will become effective in about a year (90 days after the election is certified, followed by a nine-month period to create regulations).

With respect to the District of Columbia, it is unclear whether the law will become effective because, as a district, it is subject to Congressional and Presidential approval. Given that marijuana is illegal under federal law, many believe that the federal government will block the measure from becoming law.

What does this mean for employers?

In Alaska and the District of Columbia, the laws explicitly state that they are not intended to require an employer to permit or accommodate the use of marijuana at work or affect employer’s abilities to restrict marijuana use. Both laws also prohibit driving while under the influence of marijuana.
The Oregon law provides that it is not intended to affect any state or federal law pertaining to employment matters, or to exempt a person from a federal law.
Employers in these states, and in states that allow the use of medical marijuana, should keep in mind that they have a right to maintain a drug-free workplace. However, it is important to check your state’s laws as some states have specific mandatory drug testing laws and others have voluntary regulations.

The best practice for employers is to understand their state’s laws and have a precise, written workplace drug usage and testing policy that unmistakably states an employee cannot have, use or be under the influence of marijuana in the workplace.
Also include language about your expectations of employee behavior while at work. For example, just because an employee may be using marijuana for medicinal purposes, that does not mean they can be falling asleep at their desk. HR.BLR.com has a variety of resources that can provide assistance in creating policies about drug-free workplaces.
JasminJasmin M. Rojas, JD, is a Legal Editor for BLR’s human resources and employment law publications. Ms. Rojas has several years of experience as an attorney and writer in the field of human resources and has published numerous articles on a variety of human resources and employment topics, including compensation, harassment, discrimination, work/life issues, termination, and military leave. Ms. Rojas has also presented seminars and conducted supervisory training on issues including, but not limited to, sexual harassment and other forms of workplace harassment, ADA, FMLA, internal investigations, workplace violence and workplace privacy.

Before starting her career in publishing, Ms. Rojas advised and represented employers before state courts and administrative agencies on labor and employment law matters such as claims of unfair labor practices, discrimination, wrongful discharge, retaliation, sexual harassment, unemployment and employee discipline.  Ms. Rojas is a cum laude graduate of Western New England University, School of Law, and is an avid basketball and rugby fan.

Monday 10 November 2014

Majority Of Americans Support Marijuana Legalization, 64% For Americans 18-34


In the wake of ballot sucesses in Oregon, Arizona, and Washington, D.C. on Election Day, a new Gallup poll shows that a slim majority supports legalization of marijuana, but support has dropped slightly from a year ago, suggesting that it will be some time before the legalization movement becomes a nationwide phenomenon:
PRINCETON, N.J. — A slim majority of Americans, 51%, favor legalizing the use of marijuana — similar to the 50% who supported it in 2011 and 2012, but down from a reading of 58% last year.
The new result is based on an Oct. 12-15 Gallup poll, conducted in the run-up to the midterm elections in which various pro-marijuana policy initiatives went before voters in Oregon, Washington, D.C and Florida, as well as in several cities in Maine, Michigan and elsewhere. Most of those initiatives succeeded, although a proposed Constitutional amendment in Florida to legalize medical marijuana failed with 57% of the vote, just shy of the 60% needed.
Gallup’s long-term trend on Americans’ support for legalizing marijuana shows that in 1969, just 12% of U.S. adults were in favor. But that swelled to 28% by the late 1970s, and 34% by 2003. Since then, support steadily increased to the point that 50% supported it in 2011. Last year was the first time Gallup found a solid majority in favor, at 58%. That poll was conducted amid heavy news coverage of the imminent implementation of Colorado’s marijuana legalization law, which may have contributed to what appears to have been a temporary jump in support. This year, support at 51% is still a majority, but closer to where it was in 2011 and 2012.
Here’s the chart showing how the numbers have changed:
It’s hard to say what might account for the drop from 58% last year to 50% this year. Perhaps it’s possible that some of the coverage of legalization efforts in Colorado and Washington led to some negative push back among some part of the American public. There was, after all, some typically fear mongering coverage about the issue of children getting their hands on the edible marijuana products that have proven to be particularly popular in Colorado. For the most part, though, I haven’t really noticed an up-tick in negative coverage of legalization, or even of legalization generally on a national level so that explanation does’t necessarily make sense.

Another possibility is that the 2013 number is simply a statistical blip that didn’t necessarily represent the trend After all, it was just a year before that support for legalization had hit 48% while opposition was at 50%. The fact that, just a year later, the number was at 58% for legalization and only 39% against it, then, was somewhat of a surprise, and appears to be outside of the general trend which has show that support and opposition have been moving slowly in their respective directions. This years numbers appear to continue that trend. So, perhaps we ought to just chalk up the 2013 survey to being an outlier, and recognize the broader point that, slowly but surely, support for legalization is growing.
Of course, as with many issues of this type, whether or not you support legalization is likely to depend on who you are. For example, there are definite differences based on political ideology:
Gallup Marijuana Chart Two
And, where you live:

Neither of these sets of numbers should be all too surprising, of course. To date, most of the movement on legalization and medical marijuana has come in the East and the West, which also happens to be areas of general cultural liberalism and openness. That’s likely to continue into the future, with the next likely battleground for legalization coming in 2016 in California, where advocates are working on putting the matter back on the ballot for a second time after failing to get legalization passed in 2010.

Given the nature of the electorate that is likely to come to the polls in California in 2016, and polls in that state showing much higher support for legalization than we saw four years ago, the likelihood of passage this second time, while not guaranteed, seems to be much higher. Passage of legalization in America’s most populated state is likely to have an impact around the country, of course, but the fact that support for legalization remains lower in the South and Midwest suggests that it will still be some time before those parts of the country even begin to move on the issue.

There’s one takeaway from the Gallup poll that remains as true today as it has been for several years now. Notwithstanding the drop in support from 2013 to 2014 and the fact that political ideology and geography tend to dictate public opinion on the issue, there is one cohort among whom support for legalization continues to grow notwithstanding ideology, geography, or any other demographic. Among people 18 to 34 years old, support for legalization is at 64% and growing, while support only reaches 41% among those 55 and older.

The age group in between is generally more supportive of legalization than opposed. What this suggests is that, much like support for same-sex marriage, it will be younger Americans that will guide public attitudes on this issue going forward, especially as they age and become a larger segment of the electorate. Eventually, then even the South and Midwest will become more supportive of legalization, and even conservatives will be seen as more receptive to the idea. Progress in this area is likely to be slower than what we’ve seen in the same-sex marriage battle, in no small part because there won’t be the same court action possible as there was in that area, but the inevitable direction seems to be clear. Legalization is the future.

8 Facts About Marijuana Legalization Everyone Should Know




It's been an important week for supporters of marijuana legalization.
Voters in two states — Alaska and Oregon — and Washington, D.C., took to the polls on Tuesday to approve recreational marijuana use, joining Colorado and Washington as new bastions of carefree pot smoking. Pro-legalization advocates are thrilled with the progress and are already plotting their next moves to bring legal weed to more states across the country.

But the movement to legalize marijuana didn't start this week. Supporters have been working for years to pass and implement policies in states that regulate the distribution and use of marijuana, both for medicinal and recreational purposes. In the light of the most recent progress, it's worth taking stock of where we are, and what we've learned along the way.
So, as legalized marijuana continues to build momentum in states across the country, here are eight facts everybody should keep in mind: 

1. Marijuana is legal in some form in close to half the states in the U.S.  

Four states and Washington, D.C., allow recreational marijuana. Nineteen states allow it for medical purposes, and 14 have decriminalized it.
In the states with outright legalization, possession and consumption of marijuana is legal for people age 21 and older. Alaska, Oregon, Washington and Colorado have already instated or are in the process of introducing a model whereby marijuana can be legally sold, taxed and regulated. Washington, D.C., has only legalized possession and growing for the time being, but its city council will likely move to tax and regulate soon. 

In the additional 19 states where marijuana for medicinal purposes is legal, regulation varies widely, with certain states, such as California, so lax about criteria for a medical marijuana card that it ultimately assumes a quasi-legal status.
States where marijuana has been decriminalized have softened the penalties associated with possessing the drug, often limiting or eliminating prison time and opting for fines instead. Like with medical marijuana, states vary a great deal in their laws, and decriminalization does not do away with harsh penalties for possessing or trafficking large amounts of the plant.

2. A majority of the country supports legalization.

Support for legalization over the past 25 years has steadily increased. Just 16% of those surveyed by CNN/ORC in 1990 supported legalizing marijuana. Recent polling puts support at over 50%, a clear sign that as legalization takes hold in more states, support for greater access to the drug increases:



3. Legalization could lead to billions of dollars in tax revenue.

When states legalize pot, they can levy substantial taxes on the marijuana industry and generate much-needed revenue for their budgets. Colorado's recent introduction of marijuana is already bringing in more than $30 million of taxable revenue a month — leading to upwards of $7.5 million of tax revenue. The Drug Policy Alliance estimates that California could raise $1.4 billion annually in extra revenue if it taxed and regulated the sale of marijuana. 
If marijuana is legalized federally, the marijuana industry could be more than three times bigger than the NFL — and it could all be taxed.

4. States with legalization are doing just fine.

Colorado introduced marijuana this year and has not descended into chaos or seen a catastrophic loss of productivity. Instead, it's pulling in millions of dollars in tax revenue. In September, recreational sales exceeded medical sales in the state, suggesting that state-regulated marijuana may be a viable alternative to the black market. 
Things haven't been perfect, either. Edible marijuana, the disproportionate potency of which many new consumers aren't aware of, has been associated with two fatalities and a number of emergency room visits. Advocates have taken up a campaign promoting responsible use in the state.
Washington doesn't have comparable figures, having rolled out legal marijuana more recently than Colorado and almost immediately encountering a shortage of the plant for retail. But so far, there are no reports suggesting that legalization has had adverse consequences for the state.

Source: Don Ryan/AP

5. The link between legalization and more pot use is inconclusive.

It's too early to draw conclusions from the Colorado or Washington situations on whether legalization increases overall consumption of marijuana. Vox surveyed a number of studies with conflicting conclusions on the link between overall use and access to medical marijuana or overall use and decriminalization. 
Regardless, marijuana existing as a commercial product is an entirely different animal, and its effects are impossible to anticipate. It should be said that the power of a for-profit industry to stoke more demand for a already popular drug cannot be overestimated. Exhibit A: tobacco. Exhibit B: alcohol.

6. Regulating marijuana makes society safer.

The correlation between regulation and public safety is a common sense principle borne out by history in countless industries. Just as consumers are protected by requiring restaurants to be inspected for health violations or pharmaceutical companies to submit new products to the FDA, regulating marijuana will make it more likely that consumers are getting a quality product undiluted by potentially harmful additives. 
Foul play by a specific pot retailer will be more easily flagged. If legal marijuana successfully displaces the black market, it will make access for minors far more difficult. In the long run, public discourse will finally allow us to have a conversation about responsible use.

Source: Sean Gallup/Getty Images

7. The feds are turning a blind eye to the states.

Marijuana is not legal under federal law, but no federal entity has intervened in state legalization measures so far. In the immediate aftermath of the first legalization measures, President Obama said that he has "bigger fish to fry" than cracking down on the marijuana industry. The following year, his administration released a memo stating that the Department of Justice wouldn't challenge state laws on marijuana legalization as long as they adhere to a set of strict rules regarding the sale and distribution of the drug, such as ensuring minors don't have access to it. 
Recently, Attorney General Eric Holder expressed optimism about Washington and Colorado's paths. But the legalization of recreational marijuana in the nation's capital on Tuesday brings the conflict between local and federal law into full view of federal lawmakers and could prompt congressional action.

8. Legalization helps us better understand marijuana's health effects.

The federal government's prohibition of marijuana has systematically hampered serious scientific inquiry into the health risks of marijuana for decades. We're hamstrung by a Catch-22, pithily captured by the Wire: "Marijuana is illegal because the [Drug Enforcement Administration] says it has no proven medical value, but researchers have to get approval from the DEA to research marijuana's medical value." 
There is substantial evidence on its ability to alleviate pain and nausea, but its benefits and risks are still under-explored relative to how long and how widely the drug has been used. 

Hopefully, as marijuana reform sweeps the country, we can start looking into the complex question of the carcinogenic properties of marijuana smoke and its potential to alter teenage brain development.
These are just a handful of the lessons we've learned from states' experiments in decriminalizing and legalizing marijuana use, either for medicinal or recreational use. Marijuana is hardly the harmful societal force for evil it was once considered. As that new consensus grows, we'll only know more about the drug's actual effects on society.

 Virgin Atlantic Airways
http://tinyurl.com/pjbm6r6

Luxury French Lingerie
http://tinyurl.com/o7qcz7m

From chocolate eggs to chocolate coins, give your sweet tooth a treat with our delicious products.
http://tinyurl.com/nragc9j

Monday 27 October 2014

The "green" answer to cancer

The discomfort of cancer patients is unlike any. They don’t just suffer from pain directly caused by cancer — they also have to contend with the toxic effects of the very treatments helping them in their battle. They feel nauseated and weak. They feel tired, on top of the pain they already feel. Conventional drugs for their symptoms will not always work. Unfortunately, stronger ones make them sleepy, aside from exposing them to serious adverse effects.

Then comes along marijuana. Cancer patients who get stoned for “leisure” realize that their symptoms go away – they feel a lot better after smoking weed.
They experience a drug-induced high, their symptoms melting away while they continue to smoke pot. Their anecdotes carry far and wide, reaching the ears of health practitioners. Soon enough, a debate ensues on whether or not medical marijuana use deserves to be legalized.

Taking the “high” road
Although marijuana can alleviate many symptoms experienced by cancer patients, it is addictive — and that remains one of the most common (and soundest) arguments against legalizing medical cannabis use.
A few countries, such as Canada and Israel, have legalized medicinal hemp use. Some states in the US have passed laws to legalize marijuana use for medical reasons as well. Even the Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of cannabinoids in relieving nausea and anorexia among cancer patients.

However, the US federal government still refers to marijuana as a controlled substance, one that is absolutely outlawed, according the Matthew Seamon in his 2006 article published at The Annals of Pharmacotherapy.
The conflict between state and federal laws is as yet unresolved and will remain so until the courts say that medical marijuana use is constitutional. In the meantime, doctors and patients resort to playing it by ear, something they shouldn’t have to do if the rules were clear.

As stakeholders struggle with the stalemate, Israel is tinkering with a solution that they hope will end the debate once and for all.

Mary Jane gets a makeover
In a secret location in Israel, marijuana continues to grow in seemingly endless fields. You see, unlike regular marijuana, the weed grown in these Galilean hills cannot get you addicted.
This non-addictive variant of marijuana was developed by Zach Klein, the former advocacy and development director of Tikun Olam. The company’s name is Hebrew for “repairing the world" — a suitable name, considering their novel discovery.

The new strain of marijuana, named Avidekel, contains less than two percent of tetrahydrocannabinol, the substance responsible for getting hemp users stoned. Despite the greatly reduced THC content, Avidekel marijuana still contains more than 15 percent cannabidiol, theorized to reduce inflammation.
In contrast to THC, CBD does not attach to receptors in the brain — that means it can exert its effects without getting a person “high."

Perhaps the new hemp strain can put the weed debate to rest. But the original and addictive THC-rich weed can provide relief for other symptoms, which means that marijuana supporters can still argue to have regular marijuana legalized, not just the THC-free plant.

The “pot” is black, or so the kettle says
We are years away from reaching a compromise. Legalizing marijuana, even if it’s for friends and family suffering from the disabling effects of cancer, still comes with consequences.
Others argue that many controlled drugs in the market are also addictive, such as anti-anxiety medication and sleeping pills, and that marijuana has much fewer side effects compared to these. But the back-and-forth continues as many of our doctors and lawmakers reach what seems to be an impasse.

We try out best to look for solutions. Israel is doing its part in establishing a compromise: marijuana, yes, but without the addictive THC.
But we should check our opinions at the door. What we need is more data. We need facts. We need to determine whether or not smoking the plant is better than drinking a pill composed of chemicals extracted from it.

The public also needs to be educated on both the advantages and adverse effects of marijuana use. Ulterior motives must be set aside if we want to achieve a therapeutic milestone. For instance, people who use marijuana but know very little about the science behind cannabinoids cannot simply support the legalization of marijuana for their own selfish reasons. On the other hand, people who wrinkle their nose at potheads should not automatically condemn marijuana use in medicine.

The argument between the opposing camps exists for a reason. It is actually good that we don’t agree with each other.
Much has to be done before legislators figure out whether marijuana should be legalized for medical use. Much has to be said before doctors can ensure that marijuana is a plant that should be used by people who allegedly need it.
But, as is the case in any worthy but difficult endeavor, we have to start somewhere — even if that “somewhere” is in a heated debate with brilliant people who, unfortunately, do not share the same point of view.

Virgin Atlantic Airways
http://tinyurl.com/pjbm6r6

Luxury French Lingerie
http://tinyurl.com/o7qcz7m

From chocolate eggs to chocolate coins, give your sweet tooth a treat with our delicious products.
http://tinyurl.com/nragc9j

Federal Court Hearing on Marijuana Prohibition Today

For the first time since the 1970s, defendants in a cannabis-related criminal case are being allowed to present new scientific and medical studies as part of their defense in a federal trial in California that begins today.
Starting today and for the next three days, U.S. District Judge Kimberly Mueller will be holding a hearing to determine if the classification of cannabis as a Schedule I substance is supported by scientific and medical evidence.

The marijuana growers using this defense were likely not growing the cannabis in the national forest of Trinity and Tehama counties for medical reasons, which their defense attorney, Zenia Gilg, a member of the NORML legal committee, readily admits. However, her defense is based on the premise that cannabis prohibition is unconstitutional and based on inaccurate information. If the judge agrees with Gilg, the initial ruling will have a massive impact on those with pending federal marijuana charges.

The courts will hear testimony from doctors, researchers, and even the federal Department of Justice, which has been ordered by the administration to not prosecute marijuana offenders who are complying with state laws. Expert witnesses for the defense include physician Dr. Philip Denney and Clinton-era FBI crime analyst James Nolan. They’ll be squaring off against Bertha Madras, who insists that marijuana use causes brain damage.

Ladybud Magazine commends Judge Mueller for her willingness to hear the evidence in this hearing, despite the protests of prosecutors. It is possible that the next three days could result in the beginning of the end of federal marijuana prohibition. Ladybud will be following the case and reporting on the ruling once it is made publicly available.

Virgin Atlantic Airways
http://tinyurl.com/pjbm6r6

Luxury French Lingerie
http://tinyurl.com/o7qcz7m

From chocolate eggs to chocolate coins, give your sweet tooth a treat with our delicious products.
http://tinyurl.com/nragc9j
 


Marijuana ban to have rare hearing in federal court

Marijuana users and growers usually try to stay out of federal courts, which strictly enforce the nationwide laws against the drug and have rebuffed challenges to the government’s classification of pot as one of the most dangerous narcotics.
But that could change this week when a federal judge in Sacramento, in a criminal case against seven men charged with growing marijuana on national forest land in Trinity and Tehama counties, hears what she has described as “new scientific and medical information” that raises questions about the validity of the federal ban.

The Drug Enforcement Administration classifies marijuana, along with such drugs as heroin, LSD and ecstasy, in Schedule One — substances that have a high potential for abuse, have no currently accepted medical use, and can be dangerous even under a doctor’s supervision. The classification amounts to a nationwide prohibition on the possession, use or cultivation of the drug. The DEA reaffirmed marijuana’s status in 2011, and a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., upheld it last year.

But the hearing that starts Monday may be the first of its kind in a criminal case since the early 1970s, shortly after Congress put marijuana in Schedule One under the DEA’s supervision, said Zenia Gilg, the San Francisco criminal defense lawyer who filed the current challenge.
“At that point, not a lot was known about the medicinal benefits of marijuana,” said Gilg, a member of the legal committee of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. “It’s about time somebody looked at the new evidence.”

That will be U.S. District Judge Kimberly Mueller, who granted the hearing, scheduled for three days, over prosecutors’ objections. In an April 22 order, she said lawyers for the defendants had presented expert declarations “showing there is new scientific and medical information raising contested issues of fact regarding whether the continued inclusion of marijuana as a Schedule One controlled substance ... passes constitutional muster.”

She issued the order in a case that, based on the evidence so far, has little to do with medical marijuana — the defendants are charged with growing a large tract of pot plants on forest land, and there’s been no indication that it was for medical use. But Gilg said that’s irrelevant if they were charged under an unconstitutional law.
As Gilg acknowledges, it will not be an easy case to win. She and her colleagues must prove not merely that the federal law is misguided, based on current research, but that it is entirely irrational. An initial ruling would apply only to the current defendants, but the impact would be broader if higher courts weighed in.

Support for defense
The witness list includes doctors and researchers who laud marijuana’s medical benefits and say it is much less hazardous than tobacco, alcohol and some everyday medications, and a former FBI analyst who says the federal ban has been socially destructive. Defense lawyers say they also are drawing support from an unlikely source — President Obama’s Justice Department, which, while defending the federal ban in court, has advised federal prosecutors not to charge people who are complying with their state’s marijuana laws.
California, 20 other states and Washington, D.C., allow the medical use of marijuana, and two of those states, Colorado and Washington, have also legalized personal use.

“If marijuana is actually such a dangerous drug, the rational response by the Department of Justice would be to increase, not decrease, prosecution in those states,” Gilg said in court papers. She also argued that the government’s state-by-state enforcement policy is discriminatory.
The government’s expert witness is Bertha Madras, a Harvard professor of psychobiology and a former official in the Office of National Drug Control Policy under President George W. Bush. In a court declaration, she said marijuana “has a high potential for abuse” and is properly classified among the most dangerous drugs.

Medical uses debated
Contrary to popular notions, Madras said, marijuana is addictive for frequent users, interferes with concentration and motivation, and can cause brain damage. Marijuana smoke contains “significant amounts of toxic chemicals,” she said. And despite “anecdotal evidence” that it helps some patients feel better, she said, there are no valid long-term studies that support its use as medicine — in fact, although some of the plant’s ingredients may be beneficial, “there is no such thing as medical marijuana.”

Nonsense, said Dr. Philip Denney, a defense expert witness and a founding member of the Society of Cannabis Clinicians. Despite government restrictions on the supply of marijuana for research, he said in a declaration, new studies have shown “remarkable promise” in using marijuana to relieve pain and treat numerous illnesses, including forms of hepatitis, gastrointestinal and sleep disorders, and Alzheimer’s disease.
Marijuana, Denney said, is a “nontoxic, nonlethal substance” with little potential for abuse and no recorded cases of fatalities, in contrast with the deaths caused by alcohol and tobacco. He said its side effects pale in comparison with the serious illnesses that can be caused by heavy doses of pain relievers like Tylenol and Advil and the hallucinatory effects of the main ingredient in NyQuil and Robitussin cough syrups.

Another defense expert, James Nolan, a chief of crime analysis and research for the FBI during President Bill Clinton’s administration, said the main harm caused by marijuana is “its status as an illegal substance,” which has relegated much of its distribution to criminals and cartels and ruined the lives of many of its users.
Mueller, who will weigh the conflicting testimony, is a former Sacramento city councilwoman and federal magistrate who was appointed to the bench by Obama in 2010. She is the first female judge in the Eastern District, which includes Sacramento and Fresno.

Virgin Atlantic Airways
http://tinyurl.com/pjbm6r6

Luxury French Lingerie
http://tinyurl.com/o7qcz7m

From chocolate eggs to chocolate coins, give your sweet tooth a treat with our delicious products.
http://tinyurl.com/nragc9j

Wednesday 22 October 2014

Medical Marijuana Helped Me Survive Cancer Treatment

Last November, I was diagnosed with breast cancer. Like many others in similar circumstances, I've tackled much of it with humor and a positive attitude and loads of pharmaceuticals with varying unpleasant side effects. It has been an epic battle involving a double mastectomy, radiation therapy, breast reconstruction (a process which left me miserably uncomfortable every single minute), and chemotherapy -- endless needles pumping foreign liquids into my body leaving me weak and nauseous and horribly depressed for days afterward.

At one point, many months into my treatment, I was ready to quit. There are no words to adequately describe the discomfort and despair I was feeling. It was at that time a friend of mine offered to get me some medical marijuana from Colorado. I said yes. I was willing to try anything, willing to break the law, for some relief.
Before you jump to any conclusions, I'm in my '50s and work in the medical field and am not a recreational pot smoker (or anything else for that matter.) Still, the chemotherapy combined with the prescription medications left me so miserable and incapacitated, I was desperate.

I ate it -- didn't smoke it -- I don't want to smoke anything. And it worked. Marijuana took away my nausea, so I could eat healthy. It took away the severe restlessness and anxiety, so I could relax. It allowed me to eat, sleep and be up and active when I was awake -- all of which are critical to recovery. It didn't get me "high;" it made me feel halfway normal (as opposed to the prescriptions, which left me feeling drugged and weak). It gave me the strength to continue with chemotherapy when I had reached a point where I really couldn't tolerate it anymore.

For me, the medical marijuana was a miracle drug, a life-saver. I wished I had used it from the beginning because it was so helpful. And according to our current law, I should go to jail for it.
The fact that people in Florida can legally smoke cigarettes (which are known to cause cancer), but cannot legally relieve their cancer treatment symptoms with medical marijuana is completely ridiculous. Medical marijuana is safe, is already legal in 23 states and the District of Columbia, and is supported by the American College of Physicians, American Public Health Association, American Nurses Association and many other organizations.

Yet, here in Florida politicians have decided to take it upon themselves to decide what's best for health care when medical decisions should be made by doctors and their patients, not politicians.
Amendment 2 would fix that flaw by legalizing medical marijuana and making it available for people with debilitating conditions and diseases like cancer, epilepsy, HIV/AIDS, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's.

These people deserve compassion, not threats of imprisonment or stigmatization for using a drug scientifically proven to help alleviate their misery. Doctors should be allowed to recommend medical marijuana to patients who need it and provide them a better quality of life. It seems cruel to withhold any solutions we have at our disposal.
Legalizing and regulating medical marijuana isn't only the compassionate thing to do, it's also the responsible thing to do to ensure safety.

I shared my experience with marijuana with women on a breast cancer internet forum to help empower them to take control. Out of desperation, one woman bought pot from a "street dealer" (since it's not legal), and it only made her misery worse because it wasn't the type of marijuana appropriate for her needs. Regulating marijuana means patients could get prescriptions for exactly what they need.

I have a friend who's dying from ALS who texted (because he can no longer speak) me asking if I have any marijuana. I gave him everything I had left. It breaks my heart that he and countless other suffering individuals don't have access to this simple, safe solution. I urge everyone in Florida to vote "yes" on Amendment 2 this fall. Individuals who are sick and suffering should not go to jail for medical marijuana, and neither should their doctors.

Virgin Atlantic Airways
http://tinyurl.com/pjbm6r6

Luxury French Lingerie
http://tinyurl.com/o7qcz7m

From chocolate eggs to chocolate coins, give your sweet tooth a treat with our delicious products.
http://tinyurl.com/nragc9j

Smoking cannabis does not accelerate progression of liver disease in people with HIV/HCV co-infection


Michael Carter
Smoking cannabis does not worsen liver disease in people with HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infection, Canadian research published in the online edition of Clinical Infectious Diseases shows.
“We found no evidence that cannabis smoking increases the risk of progression to significant liver fibrosis or cirrhosis,” write the authors. Results also showed that cannabis was widely used for pain relief by co-infected people.

Up to 30% of people with HIV in resource-rich countries are co-infected with HCV. Liver disease caused by HCV is a leading cause of serious illness and death in these co-infected individuals.
Cannabis (marijuana) is believed to be widely used by people with HIV. In a study conducted in Ontario, Canada, 43% of participants reported use of cannabis in the previous year, 29% saying they had self-medicated with the drug.

Previous research examining the effects of cannabis consumption on liver disease outcomes has produced conflicting results. Three cross-sectional – or 'snapshot' – studies involving people with chronic HCV infection found an association between cannabis use and liver cirrhosis. In contrast, a small study involving 58 people with HIV showed no association between cannabis use and significant changes in liver enzyme levels over one year.

Given this uncertainty, investigators in Canada designed a prospective study involving 690 HIV-positive people with chronic HCV co-infection and no significant fibrosis at baseline enrolled in the Canadian Coinfection Cohort study. Every six months, participants were asked if they had used cannabis. Users of the drug were asked how often they smoked cannabis and the number of joints they consumed on the days they smoked.

The investigators then examined the association between cannabis use and progression to significant fibrosis, cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease. Significant fibrosis was defined as an AST platelet ratio index (APRI) score of 1.5 or above. An APRI score of 2.0 was used to diagnose cirrhosis and the authors also looked at the relationship between cannabis use and progression to a clinical cirrhosis diagnosis.

The investigators were concerned that participants might start to consume cannabis – or intensify their use of the drug – to alleviate symptoms related to advancing liver disease. By collecting concurrent data on exposure to cannabis and disease outcomes it could appear that cannabis caused liver disease when in fact this was present before the participant changed their drug-use behaviour. The investigators therefore repeated their analyses looking at cannabis use in the six to twelve month period before liver disease assessments. They called this method of analysis “lagging”.

The participants were followed for a median of 2.7 years and contributed a total of 1875 person-years of follow-up. The majority of participants were male and the median age at baseline was 44 years. Most of the participants had an undetectable HIV viral load and the median CD4 cell count at the start of the study was 400 cells/mm3. Injecting drug use was reported by 38% of participants and 15% had alcohol abuse issues.

Over half (53%) of participants reported use of cannabis at baseline with similar proportion of individuals using the drug through follow-up. On entry to the study, approximately 40% of participants who used cannabis said they did so for symptom relief, and this proportion increased to over 50% during follow-up. Turning to frequency of use, the investigators found that 40% of cannabis smokers consumed the drug on a daily basis.

During follow-up, 19% of participants developed significant fibrosis, 15% cirrhosis (diagnosed by APRI score), 1% received a clinical diagnosis of cirrhosis and 2% progressed to end-stage liver disease.
The incidence rate of progression to APRI 1.5 or above was 39.2 per 1000 person-visits; incidence of progression to APRI 2.0 or above was 29.2 per 1000 person-visits; incidence of progression to a clinical cirrhosis diagnosis was 2.1 per 1000 person-visits; and incidence of progression to end-stage liver disease was 2.9 per 1000 person-visits. There were no differences in these incidence rates between users and non-users of cannabis.

The investigators’ initial analysis appeared to show that smoking cannabis accelerated progression to a clinical diagnosis of cirrhosis (HR = 1.33; 95% CI, 1.09-1.62 per ten joints/week). However, after lagging this association ceased to be significant. Smoking cannabis was also initially associated with a combined outcome of clinically diagnosed cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease (HR = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.28). But once again this association ceased to be significant when the researchers looked at cannabis consumption in the six to twelve months before the clinical outcomes were diagnosed.

“Reported use for symptom relief was very prevalent suggesting that the association of daily cannabis use and more advanced fibrosis may, in fact, be related to an increased use for symptoms management of the disease,” the authors suggest. “Previous cross-sectional studies reporting an association between marijuana smoking and liver fibrosis may be biased by reverse causation due to self-medication with marijuana for relief of symptoms related to significant liver fibrosis.”

They conclude, “We could not demonstrate any important effect of marijuana on liver disease outcomes.”

Virgin Atlantic Airways
http://tinyurl.com/pjbm6r6

Luxury French Lingerie
http://tinyurl.com/o7qcz7m

From chocolate eggs to chocolate coins, give your sweet tooth a treat with our delicious products.
http://tinyurl.com/nragc9j

Sunday 12 October 2014

It’s Time To End The Stigmatization Of Medical Marijuana



I’m not going to lie: I like weed.

Most college students like weed. I wouldn’t be surprised if many of our professors liked weed, as well. Despite being classified as a Schedule I drug by the federal government—along with heroin and LSD in the category of drugs that have “no medical use” and are most likely to be abused—smoking weed has never seemed to be a deviant activity. Hell, when I was growing up, underage drinking seemed to be more immoral than smoking weed.

However, I differ from my peers in the fact that my endorsement of marijuana isn’t just because I like to be high.

I suffer from a rare, inherited degenerative tissue disorder called Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Type III that affects merely 1 in 15,000 people worldwide. At the age of 19-years-old, I already have osteoarthritis, and experience frequent joint dislocations, a proclivity to skin lacerations, horrible scarring, and constant, severe fatigue and pain.

Currently, there is no cure for EDS, and medical treatment is focused on pain management—meaning I have enough pill bottles of prescription painkillers and muscle relaxers to decorate a Christmas tree.

Although painkillers can help make basic, every day tasks—like walking to class or going to the grocery store—more bearable, it’s no secret that they’re incredibly addictive. Last year, NYU Local reported that the resurgence of heroin use may be tied to prescription opiates. The threat of opiate addiction is very real and so very scary, which is exactly why I attempt to avoid taking my Vicodin if I can.

This is where weed comes into play. Researchers at Johns Hopkins have recently found that, in states in which medical marijuana is legal and available, the incidence of prescription opiate-related overdoses decreased by 25%. The study emphasizes that medical marijuana users aren’t using prescription opiates at all, but rather that they may be choosing weed over pills more often.

Despite being one of the most progressive states in the country, New York’s medical marijuana bill—passed this summer, making it the 23rd state to embrace the legalization of marijuana as medicine—is stringent. Unlike my native state of California, medical marijuana prescribed in New York state cannot be smoked, and can only be prescribed to people suffering with serious conditions like cancer, multiple sclerosis, and ALS.

When the bill is fully implemented within the next year, there will only be twenty dispensaries statewide. And although the New York Compassionate Care Act was supported by Governor Cuomo and Staten Island state senator Diane Savino–the latter of whom hopes to bring a dispensary to Staten Island–the medical marijuana movement is being stymied by both the federal government and the old-school legislators who remain steadfast in their belief that marijuana has no medical use and is incredibly dangerous.

It’s so incredibly difficult to enjoy life as a 19-year-old should when you’re plagued by throbbing, swollen joints and consistent exhaustion. But, for me, marijuana makes it a little bit easier. The science is there: marijuana can and does ameliorate chronic pain. In my home state, I am eligible for a medical marijuana prescription; however, it’s questionable whether I’d be eligible in New York to legally receive medical marijuana for medicinal use.

And that leads to the biggest question on my mind: why? As the daughter of a heroin addict who died by overdose six years ago, it blows my mind that heroin and marijuana are considered by the DEA as being equally dangerous and addictive. Perhaps the DEA’s classification is inspired by the idea that it’s the government’s responsibility to enforce some sort of moral code upon the electorate; however, to me, it’s just unfathomable that a substance that can help so many people cope with their severe medical conditions is demonized as some sort of potentially fatal and morally reprehensible drug.

Change comes with time, and I’m hoping that, sometime before I die, the stigmatization of marijuana will disappear, and maybe the number of people choosing marijuana over potentially fatal doses of opiates will decrease even further. But, until then, I’ll manage my pain as best as I can, and will continue to advocate for broader availability of medical marijuana.

Virgin Atlantic Airways
http://tinyurl.com/pjbm6r6

Luxury French Lingerie
http://tinyurl.com/o7qcz7m

From chocolate eggs to chocolate coins, give your sweet tooth a treat with our delicious products.
http://tinyurl.com/nragc9j

Saturday 11 October 2014

Top Ten Reasons to End Marijuana Prohibition by Taxing and Regulating Marijuana



1. Prohibition has failed – marijuana use is mainstream and widespread.

When the federal government first effectively prohibited marijuana in 1937, relatively few Americans had even heard of it. Today, according to 2010 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services data, 106 million Americans admit to having tried it (17.4 million in the last month), and every year, the Monitoring the Future survey finds that over 80% of high school seniors say marijuana is easy to obtain.

2. Prohibition is an immense waste of public resources, while marijuana taxation would bring in much-needed revenue.

According to 2010 estimates by Harvard University economist Jeffrey Miron, replacing marijuana prohibition with a system of taxation and regulation would yield $17.4 billion government savings and increased tax revenues.

3. Arresting and prosecuting marijuana offenders prevent police from focusing on real crime.

In Chicago alone, the police superintendent estimated officers spent 45,000 police hours on arrests for 10 grams or less of marijuana in a year. Meanwhile, FBI data shows that less than half of violent crimes and only 18% of property crimes were cleared nationwide in 2010.

4. Prohibition sends an incredible number of Americans through the criminal justice system, ruining countless lives.

According to the FBI, since 1995, there have been more than 12 million U.S. marijuana arrests, with 853,838 in 2010 – significantly more than for all violent crimes combined. Eighty-eight percent of these arrests are for possession – not manufacture or distribution.

5. Marijuana laws are enforced unevenly.

According to Jon Gettman, Ph.D., blacks are three times as likely to be arrested for marijuana possession than whites, despite the fact that use rates among African Americans are proportional to use rates among whites. While marijuana users who were not convicted have gone on the be president or Supreme Court justice, a criminal conviction can stand in the way of securing a job; getting housing; or receiving a professional license, student loans, food assistance, a driver’s license, a firearms permit, or the right to vote.

6. There is no evidence that imposing criminal penalties on marijuana use reduces its use.

The National Research Council found that “perceived legal risks explains very little in the variance of individual drug use”. In 2008, the World Health Organization found that in the Netherlands, where adults are allowed to purchase and possess small amounts of marijuana, both teen and adult use significantly lower than in U.S., where marijuana is illegal.

7. Prohibition makes control impossible.

Producers and sellers of marijuana are completely unregulated. Unlike licensed businesses that sell liquor or tobacco, marijuana sellers operate virtually anywhere and have no incentive not to sell to minors. Prohibition guarantees that marijuana cannot undergo quality control inspectors for purity and potency, creating possible health hazards as a result of contamination by pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers, molds, fungi, or bacteria, as well as the lacing of marijuana with other drugs or formaldehyde. Under taxation and regulation, producers and sellers would be licensed and zoned accordingly.

8. Marijuana prohibition breeds violence.

Currently, the only sellers of marijuana are criminals. As in 1920’s Chicago, since disputes cannot be solved lawfully, violence is inevitable. According to the Atlantic, since 2006, more than 50,000 people have been killed in Mexican drug cartel-related violence. Those purchasing marijuana illegally also may face muggings and other violence.

9. Prohibition is bad for the environment.

Because marijuana cultivation is illegal, unlicensed, and carries felony charges, it often takes place in environmentally damaging locations such as national parks and wilderness areas. Under taxation and regulation, marijuana sales would be relegated to regulated, licensed businesses, which would cultivate in legally zoned areas.

10. Marijuana is safer than alcohol.

Unlike legal substances such as water, alcohol, Tylenol, and prescription opiates, marijuana has never caused a single medically documented overdose death in recorded history. Alcohol causes hundreds of overdose deaths each year, and in 2009 (the latest year for which data is available), the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported 24,518 “alcohol-induced death”. The British government’s official scientific body on drug policy concluded that {legally regulated drugs} alcohol and tobacco are “significantly more harmful than marijuana”. American law treats alcohol as if it were safer than marijuana, encouraging people to drink.