Liberal MP Bill Blair wants to make it clear the growth and sale of legal marijuana in Canada will not be a free-for-all.
In
an interview, the chief architect of the country’s new marijuana regime
frequently used such words as “control” and “strict regulation” as he
discussed the federal government’s options.
The former chief of the Toronto Police
Service supports legalization, but mainly as a tool to restrict access
for young people and to deal with the social and health problems caused
by the drug.
Mr. Blair, who is
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice, is keeping his
options open as he maps out the path to legal marijuana in Canada.
However, he is not siding with the proponents of casual and widespread
access to the drug for recreational purposes.
“There
is a need for some control,” he said. “Our intent is to legalize,
regulate and restrict. There needs to be reasonable restrictions on
making sure that we keep it away from kids, because I think that is very
much in the public interest. We also have to ensure that the social and
the health harms are properly managed and mitigated, and that can be
done through regulation.”
Illegal pot
dispensaries are appearing in greater numbers across the country. In
addition, some advocates of legalization say that the Trudeau
government’s promise to make pot legal means police should immediately
stop charging people for possessing marijuana.
On
the other hand, some people in the marijuana industry say only licensed
and regulated operators should be able to grow and sell the drug. In
particular, a number of investors in the medical marijuana business,
which was heavily regulated by the Conservative government, want similar
rules and restrictions for recreational pot.
Mr.
Blair promised that a federal-provincial-territorial task force on the
legalization of marijuana will study various models in Canada and around
the world.
“The medical marijuana
community has contributed quite significantly to the research and to
some models that will be very useful in helping us ensure that if there
is going to be a legalization and movement toward a strict regulatory
regime, that it can be done in a way that is protective of people’s
health and all of the public health concerns,” he said.
In particular, he insisted that pot users will need to know what they are smoking or ingesting under the new system.
“One
of the things that we have to be concerned with is to ensure that it’s
not adulterated in any way; that we have some understanding of its
quality and its potency, so that if it is to be used by an adult
population, that it can be done safely and in a healthy way,” Mr. Blair
said.
He said the structure of the task
force remains unclear, and refused to indicate when the government will
be ready to change the Criminal Code to implement legalization. Mr.
Blair acknowledged there are starkly different points of views on the
issue, promising to hear from all sides.
“The
best policy will be evidence-based, and we will gather that evidence,”
he said. “There are many people who have concerns, and I want to hear
those concerns, and there are many people who have advice, and we will
listen to them.”
James McIntosh, a
professor of economics at Concordia University in Montreal, said the
government will have to find the right spot on the spectrum between
“laissez-faire” and “centralized control.” Dr. McIntosh said users
simply “want to be able to get good stuff cheaply and hassle-free,”
while many medical experts still have concerns over the use of the drug,
especially by youth.
Mr. Blair said
that as he consults on the issue, he will not be swayed by individuals,
including his friend and former colleague at the Toronto Police Service,
Kim Derry.
In a recent interview, Mr.
Derry said the new system should get rid of the “goons” that operate in
the marijuana business. Mr. Derry is part of a project seeking a licence
to grow medical marijuana north of Toronto, and said he would not
hesitate to make his views known to Mr. Blair.
However,
Mr. Blair said: “There is a wide diversity of opinion, and it’s
important that those opinions be heard, but I’m not responding to any
particular lobbyist or individual on this.”
No comments:
Post a Comment