This Blog is about Cannabis, marijuana, weed, ganja.
Tuesday, 1 November 2016
America’s Legal Pot Economy Is Forced Underground
Nine
more states will vote next week on whether to legalize some aspect of
marijuana use. But banks willing to provide services to cannabis
companies are still hard to find.
Polly Mosendz
Suzanne Woolley
Illustration: Stephanie Davidson
Punctuated
by sharp intakes of breath, Max Simon repeated himself softly, trying
to mask a deep frustration. “We … are … a … media … company. We produce media.”
Like
many startup founders, the 34-year-old has a spiel right down to the
enunciation and cadence. He gave his speech nine times, to nine
different bankers. Eight rejected him. But it wasn’t venture capital he
was seeking. It was a checking account.
Simon is the founder of
Green Flower Media LLC, a production company in Ojai, Calif., that sells
educational videos about marijuana, with topics ranging from medicinal
use to cannabis industry investing. He likens the platform to a
cannabis-centric Lynda.com, the online-course company owned by LinkedIn.
Shortly after Green Flower sold its first batch of videos, Simon
received an e-mail from Chase Bank. The company’s corporate account was
being shut down.
It took a series of meandering customer service
calls for him to discover why: The account, he was told, was marked
“high risk” because the company is part of the marijuana industry. For
the next several months, Green Flower didn’t have a bank, placing it in a
financial netherworld that can make life near-impossible for any going
concern. Simon was forced to withdraw money from a different business to
ensure that employee checks didn’t bounce.
“We have no
relationship with the plant whatsoever,” he said. “We don’t
even touch the plant.”
Simon was rejected by banks and credit unions of
all sizes before finally being offered an account with a financial
institution, which he declined to name so as not to draw additional
scrutiny. (Asked why Simon’s account was closed, a spokesman for Chase
said only that “as a federally-regulated institution, we follow federal
laws.”)
As America’s cannabis industry joins the legitimate
economy, its evolution is being handicapped by a lack of basic banking
infrastructure—a fact directly tied to its uneven legality among the 50
states and the ever-present threat of criminal action by the tut-tutting
federal government.
While logistical issues facing dispensaries are
well known, obstacles to setting up the most basic of commercial
operations extend far afield, hobbling scores of vendors and service
providers who could help the industry emerge from the shadows.
This
could get a lot messier next week. On Nov. 8, Arkansas, Florida, North
Dakota, and Montana (which is voting to restore what legislators have
rolled back) will ask voters to decide whether they should join, in some
fashion, Washington, D.C., and the two dozen states where cannabis is
legal for medicinal use. Arizona, California, Maine, Massachusetts, and
Nevada will vote on whether to join the four states (and the nation’s
capital) where it’s allowed for recreational use by adults.
If
just California voted yes, and its 39 million residents suddenly found
themselves able to purchase marijuana freely, the size of the industry
could triple, to $18 billion, forcing regulators and banks to reevaluate
their institutional trepidation.
From
video companies such as Green Flower to marketing outfits to makers of
plastic and paper packaging: Once banks get wind you’re part of the $6
billion-plus legal marijuana industry, the doors often slam shut.
In
Cleveland, Patrick McManamon got the bad news when his wife’s debit
card was declined at Target. PNC Financial Services booted McManamon
from his personal account, his corporate account, and the 70-year-old
account of a related family business. In 2010, he founded Cannasure
Insurance Services LLC, an insurance business specializing in policies
for the cannabis industry.
It, too, doesn’t deal with actual pot plants.
In fact, recreational marijuana is illegal in Ohio. McManamon tried to
find another bank. It wasn’t easy.
“I had to make payroll. So I
opened a bank account and just said I was in the insurance
space,” he said. “After probably about a year, they figured out what we
were doing.” He moved on to a small regional bank, where he lasted for
nine months until they dropped him. The next bank took his business for
just six months. By his fifth bank, McManamon realized he’d have to get a
little sneaky.
“We started to notice that banks were asking the
question, ‘Are you doing any cannabis-related work?’ If they ask, we
aren’t going to lie,” he said. So he created another holding company
with an innocuous name (he declined to disclose it or the bank). As
backup, McManamon also keeps as much as $20,000 on hand at two other
banks he can tap in an emergency.
“It’s an enormous amount of stress,
not being able to make payroll, not being able to make rent, because you
don’t have access to a checking account,” he said. “It’s something we
shouldn’t have to worry about.” (PNC said it avoids cannabis
industry-related accounts, declining further comment.)
In 2012,
Colorado and Washington became the first states to legalize the sale of
recreational cannabis. Faced with creating a new infrastructure to
regulate a heavily taxed vice industry, things moved slowly. A year
later, the Justice Department handed down the Cole Memorandum (PDF),
named for its author, Deputy U.S. Attorney General James M. Cole, which
laid out the ground rules as far as the federal government was
concerned. The memo barred, among other things, distribution of
recreational cannabis to minors, shipping across state lines, and
possession on federal property.
Illustration: Stephanie Davidson
The
task of determining how to handle money earned by the newly legalized
industry fell to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network, which issued guidelines in 2014.
“Thorough customer due
diligence is a critical aspect of making this assessment,” the guidance
stated. FinCEN left it up to the banks to decide whether the risk was
worth the reward, and it didn’t differentiate between companies that
physically handle marijuana and those that have no direct connection to a
physical plant.
Since the guidance was issued, just 301 banks
have chosen to serve the cannabis industry, less than 3 percent of the
nation’s 11,954 federally regulated banks and credit unions.
The
U.S. government’s role in regulating banks has even made it difficult
for cannabis companies to rent office space. Washington state pot
edibles company BotanicaSEATTLE found that landlords who carried a
mortgage from a national bank were leery of renting to it.
Throw in
zoning laws regulating where a company can operate, and it took Chris
Abbott, the company’s co-founder, about six months to find a place to
hang his hat. Even Simon’s Green Flower, which has no dealings with
physical pot, couldn’t get a lease. “We try to explain that to them in a
way that they get over it,” Simon said. But often to no avail.
Companies
in the cannabis industry are also at a disadvantage because, as a
Schedule I drug under federal law, marijuana can’t be bought with a
credit card, and dispensaries can’t have their own corporate cards.
Often ancillary businesses, such as the dispensary’s vendors or
non-marijuana suppliers, don’t have access to banks or credit cards,
either.
Agents working on behalf of Green Flower reached out to
some 40 credit-card middlemen, which operate as a gateway between
companies and credit-card providers, before one agreed to work with
it—though with costly conditions. Green Flower pays $100 in monthly
fees, as well as 4.95 percent, plus 25 cents on every credit-card
transaction it accepts. The merchant processor also imposed a 10 percent
reserve and capped the company at $40,000 in monthly transactions.
After six months without incident, the processor increased the cap to
$250,000 and reduced the reserve to 5 percent. “At some point, when
you’re in the cannabis space, you almost accept it as par for the
course,” Simon said of the onerous provisions. “But it certainly was
shocking.”
It’s
not hard to understand the cost-benefit analysis that big banks, or
even landlords, are applying. Who wants to risk running afoul of the
federal government if you don’t have to? And more specifically,
nationwide banks such as Citigroup Inc. and Bank of America Corp. won’t
touch the industry because they are directly regulated by Washington.
They have high sensitivity to reputational risk or stigma, explained
John Vardaman, general counsel for Hypur, which sells compliance and
other software designed for working with “high-risk,” cash-intensive
businesses.
Still, there is some good news for pot purveyors. “For
small and midsize banks looking for new revenue streams, there’s an
increasing awareness that this is a market worth pursuing,” he said.
These small banks, however, must first take on enormous regulatory and
compliance burdens.
Colorado, as the cradle of marijuana
legalization, is one place where pot-friendly financial services have
taken root—but it hasn’t been a casual undertaking. Safe Harbor Private Banking,
a division of Partner Colorado Credit Union, has six private bankers,
two compliance officers, and a vice president dedicated to handling just
95 cannabis industry clients, who have a total of 250 accounts. This
year, that team had to file 3,500 reports to FinCEN, some dozens of
pages long.
Sundie Seefried, the credit union’s 55-year-old
president, said that at first she was reluctant to get involved. “My
thought was, ‘I'm not touching that,’” she said. “But I had some
attorney friends with clients in the cannabis industry, and they
challenged me. They asked me to give them one good reason why we
wouldn’t bank the industry.”
So Seefried talked to their clients
about how they were banking, and learned how their bank accounts had
been closed. She heard horror stories, including one of a company forced
to run a 500-person payroll in cash; people toting $40,000 in backpacks
to grocery stores so they could buy money orders; accounts with
non-cannabis related names and bankers who advised customers to deposit
less than $9,000 at a time to avoid getting too close to federal
reporting requirements.
There were huge deposits made at bank machines
in the middle of the night to avoid inconveniencing other customers and
thus inviting scrutiny, cash shipped in the back of cars, stuffed into
safe-deposit boxes, or socked away in hidden home safes.
“I realized,” Seefried said, “we're making criminals of this industry.”
Among
the banks that work with cannabis clients, some have only a handful of
them, and most don’t advertise for more business. “The banks we work
with are still somewhat reluctant to have it known that they’re entering
this space,” Vardaman said. Partly, that’s because they don’t want to
be flooded with requests from cannabis companies. “I always recommend
that banks don’t advertise,” said Tom Fleming, co-founder of the
cannabis compliance-software firm Link to Banking and a former assistant
director of FinCEN’s Office of Compliance. “Everyone in the industry
will be at their front door the next day.”
Salal Credit Union,
based in Washington state, can vouch for that. Since it became known two
years ago that the bank was taking on clients in the cannabis industry,
it has received about 3,000 inquiries.
Entering
the cannabis banking arena also requires an affinity for complex
federal regulations and the courage to face draconian penalties if a
mistake is made. Seefried pointed to the possibility of fines running
into the millions of dollars for violating the Bank Secrecy Act. Her
accountant even made her read the book Orange Is the New Black before agreeing to a meeting.
After
spending close to a year developing a risk mitigation strategy,
Seefried began interviewing potential clients. This included setting up
Safe Harbor Private Banking as a separate division to protect the credit
union’s reputation with customers and community members who may not be
as open minded. Concerned with the credit union becoming a target for
robbery, she required clients to hire armored car services to count and
vault their money. The armored car company would tell the bank how much
to credit the customer’s account and then ship the cash—now the credit
union’s money—to the Denver Federal Reserve.
Illustration: Stephanie Davidson
Seefried
said that, as a credit union, she wanted to enter the industry as a
low-cost provider. She charges licensed dispensaries, cultivators, and
makers of marijuana edibles 0.3 percent against deposited funds, up to a
maximum fee of $3,500; accounts held by ancillary cannabis businesses
are charged $150 a month. She’s heard of other banks wanting to charge
as much as 7 percent to manage cannabis-related money.
Cannasure’s
McManamon said he was once offered a checking account on the condition
he pay a $1,200 fee every month. Salal charges minimum monthly fees of
$50 for ancillary cannabis clients, $250 for a cannabis producer or
processor, and $350 for a cannabis retailer, with additional costs based
on overall transactions, cash pickup, and wire transfer frequency.
Seefried
defends putting non-retail cannabis industry businesses, such as
Cannasure, under the same scrutiny as sellers. They still take in money
earned through cannabis sales, she said. “What if my ancillary client
has a customer that is unbanked—how do I know that money they’re paid
with isn’t illicit?” she explained. “You have to know their customer’s
customer.”
At Salal, bankers visit their clients regularly and do
quarterly and monthly account monitoring, as well as an annual review.
Carmella Murphy Houston, Salal’s vice president of business services,
oversees a department of nine people dedicated to these customers. “We
do charge a premium for these accounts because of this added due
diligence,” she said.
The return on assets at Partner Colorado was
0.45 percent year-to-date, Seefried said, well below the 0.77 percent
average return reported in the second quarter of this year for credit
unions nationwide, according to data kept by the NCUA (PDF).
Salal fared better, boasting a 0.85 percent ROA this quarter, up from
0.29 percent in the third quarter of 2014, shortly after it started
taking on pot industry clients. This boost is due in part to how many of
those clients Salal has taken on: It has doubled its business clients,
from 250 customers to 500.
For
Henry Wykowski, a veteran cannabis industry lawyer, a $70,000 cash
deposit was the beginning of the end of his relationship with Comerica
Inc.
A federal prosecutor when Jimmy Carter was president,
Wykowski had banked with Comerica for two decades and kept a sizable
client trust account there. Some of his clients, including Oakland,
Calif.-based Harborside Health Center, paid him in cash. So he asked his
banker if cash deposits from clients he knew well would be problematic:
He was assured they would not. The bank set up a room for him with cash
counters whenever he came in, and deposits ran smoothly.
Wykowski
may not have actually told Comerica his clients were cannabis
companies. But when the lawyer went in with one of the founders
of Harborside, a man whose legal name is Dress Wedding, any mystery was
quickly eliminated. Everyone knew Wedding from a Discovery Channel
television documentary series called “Weed Wars"—he sports long hair and
a longer beard and was wearing one of his trademark tie-dyed dresses.
He also had a backpack filled with $70,000.
Wykowski was able to
make half a dozen additional big cash deposits, some as much as
$100,000, before the letter arrived: His account was to be closed. His
local branch thought it was a mistake, but the order came from the
corporate office. Wykowski said he never got a straight answer about
why, and a Comerica spokesman said only that the bank doesn’t comment on
customer relationships.
Now Wykowski tries to get paid by check
as much as possible; when he gets cash, he reports it as income but
doesn’t deposit it. The rest—well, it goes into safety deposit boxes and
other undisclosed “safe places.”
“This strikes me as ludicrous,”
Wykowski said. As a prosecutor, “all of our focus was to get the
underground economy above ground. The way you do that is to take the
cash, because when it is deposited, you can follow its paper trail,” he
said. “It is self-defeating for the government not to encourage people
to use bank accounts and accept their cash.”
People in the
business have been forced to be “more clever with banking, so a lot have
indirect banking so they can pay with checks or wire transfers,” the
lawyer said. He doesn’t want to give an exact definition of “indirect
banking,” however, since “the Drug Enforcement Agency tries to foil any
workarounds we come up with.”
For a while, Wykowski said, one
strategy was to hire an armored car service that would deposit the
client’s cash in its own general account, then wire it to the client’s
banks, and that the DEA found out and wrote a letter to the armored car
company saying it would pull its license if it didn’t stop.
The DEA said
in a statement they didn’t send such a letter but did have “some
telephonic discussions with multiple armored car companies.” These
discussions, the DEA said, were to advise the companies “of things we
were observing in the ‘state legalized’ marijuana business.” The DEA
does not have direct jurisdiction over licensing decisions made by state
authorities. (The armored car company didn’t return requests for
comment.)
Even elite cannabis investing networks struggle to keep
banking relationships. Troy Dayton is chief executive officer of the
Arcview Group, a network of 550 high-net-worth individuals with more
than $85 million plowed into 131 cannabis-related
businesses. Earlier this year, Arcview’s bank of six years gave it 30
days to take out its cash, the only explanation being they were involved
in the cannabis industry, Dayton said.
Industry experts wonder
whether the ultimate solution to the payment processing issue is a
closed-loop payment system, an American Express of pot, if you will.
Many companies are working on different kinds of “electronic wallet”
solutions, but fees can be high, and some efforts are in early stages.
One option Seefried offers her customers is a debit card tied to
checking called CanPay; right now, it’s used at four locations in
Colorado and one in Washington state.
Arcview’s Dayton said these
are all localized band-aids on a national problem that needs a national
solution—not unlike a century ago, when alcohol was the underground drug
of choice. None of the cannabis industry’s banking issues will get
resolved, he said, until the federal government ends what he calls
“marijuana prohibition.”
Wykowski figures there will eventually be
a “catastrophic robbery” in which people will get hurt. “It will be a
big wakeup call to the state, as well as the federal government, that
they are unnecessarily putting people in danger,” he said.
“Let’s
get real,” he said. “We’re here, we’re staying, we’re too big to close
down, and if you do close us down, you’re opening up the country to the
Mexican cartels. You may as well have this role filled by people who are
trying to follow the law and pay taxes.”
No comments:
Post a Comment