Lisa McClane, Donald Paradiso
Jackson Lewis P.C.
A
growing number of states have passed anti-discrimination laws
pertaining to medical marijuana use. While medical marijuana is becoming
widely legalized under state law, marijuana and its most identifiable
active chemical, THC, remain listed as Schedule I drugs under the
federal Controlled Substances Act. Still, the legalized marijuana
market, and the science behind the research and development of new
products, has come a long way. The marijuana industry now mass produces
widely available extracts, oils, and edible products all with varying
potency. Unfortunately, state laws pertaining to the use of marijuana
and THC-based products are under-developed, vary from state-to-state,
often conflict, and are subject to a great deal of misinformation,
especially on social media.
This rapid market development combined with the lack of clear guidance is fertile ground for unintentional violations of law by employees and employers alike.
Federal Regulations May Prohibit Marijuana Use in States Where Legal
One area where employees and employers should be particularly mindful is with respect to positions that are regulated according to federal law. These positions usually involve federal money, federal contractors, and safety sensitive positions that cross state lines. For example, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) regulates interstate commercial trucking. The FMCSA and the U.S. Department of Transportation have published guidance stating “a person is not physically qualified to drive a [Commercial Motor Vehicle] if he or she uses any Schedule I controlled substance such as marijuana.” 49 CFR §§ 391.11(b)(4) and 391.41(b)(12)) (emphasis added).
In other words, even if an employer is based in a state where medical marijuana is medicinally and recreationally legal under state law, federal regulation may prohibit employees from using marijuana products if they drive commercial motor vehicles or engage in other federally regulated professions.
Occupation Specific Prohibition in Recreationally Legal State
Some occupations outright ban the use of marijuana for particular occupations as a matter of state law, regardless of whether other state law permits medicinal or recreational marijuana use.
Recently, a Nevada driver sued his employer after the taxi company discovered that he routinely used marijuana products and terminated his employment. The plaintiff alleged that he was using marijuana to treat a medical condition. Nevada has legalized marijuana for medicinal and recreational purposes.
Nevada’s statutes also prohibits a Nevada employer from discriminating against an employee for the lawful use of any product while not on employer time. Notwithstanding these state laws, Nevada’s Legislature also adopted FMCSA drug-use regulations specifically for taxicab motor carriers.
That meant that even though marijuana is lawful in Nevada, state law also prohibited any person from operating a taxicab while using marijuana, even off-the-clock.
Employers Across Multiple Industries Are Effected
Some effected industries include transportation, energy, defense, and federal contracting. To make things even more confusing, these prohibitions could also differ from state to state. Also, if an occupation involves the handling, use, transfer, or sale of firearms, those professions may too be off limits to medical marijuana users according to a recent letter from the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosive (ATF). Moreover, even if some of the earliest adopting states permit employers to regulate marijuana use in the workplace, these prohibitions naturally implicate federal and state drug testing laws as well.
Employers Should Not Guess
The current legal state of medical and recreational marijuana use in the workplace is in flux. Thus, it is critical to have competent legal counsel versed in the most recent state and national marijuana developments to guide employers. Employers should consult with competent legal counsel in the jurisdictions in which they operate to determine if they are compliant with state and federal law.
This rapid market development combined with the lack of clear guidance is fertile ground for unintentional violations of law by employees and employers alike.
Federal Regulations May Prohibit Marijuana Use in States Where Legal
One area where employees and employers should be particularly mindful is with respect to positions that are regulated according to federal law. These positions usually involve federal money, federal contractors, and safety sensitive positions that cross state lines. For example, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) regulates interstate commercial trucking. The FMCSA and the U.S. Department of Transportation have published guidance stating “a person is not physically qualified to drive a [Commercial Motor Vehicle] if he or she uses any Schedule I controlled substance such as marijuana.” 49 CFR §§ 391.11(b)(4) and 391.41(b)(12)) (emphasis added).
In other words, even if an employer is based in a state where medical marijuana is medicinally and recreationally legal under state law, federal regulation may prohibit employees from using marijuana products if they drive commercial motor vehicles or engage in other federally regulated professions.
Occupation Specific Prohibition in Recreationally Legal State
Some occupations outright ban the use of marijuana for particular occupations as a matter of state law, regardless of whether other state law permits medicinal or recreational marijuana use.
Recently, a Nevada driver sued his employer after the taxi company discovered that he routinely used marijuana products and terminated his employment. The plaintiff alleged that he was using marijuana to treat a medical condition. Nevada has legalized marijuana for medicinal and recreational purposes.
Nevada’s statutes also prohibits a Nevada employer from discriminating against an employee for the lawful use of any product while not on employer time. Notwithstanding these state laws, Nevada’s Legislature also adopted FMCSA drug-use regulations specifically for taxicab motor carriers.
That meant that even though marijuana is lawful in Nevada, state law also prohibited any person from operating a taxicab while using marijuana, even off-the-clock.
Employers Across Multiple Industries Are Effected
Some effected industries include transportation, energy, defense, and federal contracting. To make things even more confusing, these prohibitions could also differ from state to state. Also, if an occupation involves the handling, use, transfer, or sale of firearms, those professions may too be off limits to medical marijuana users according to a recent letter from the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosive (ATF). Moreover, even if some of the earliest adopting states permit employers to regulate marijuana use in the workplace, these prohibitions naturally implicate federal and state drug testing laws as well.
Employers Should Not Guess
The current legal state of medical and recreational marijuana use in the workplace is in flux. Thus, it is critical to have competent legal counsel versed in the most recent state and national marijuana developments to guide employers. Employers should consult with competent legal counsel in the jurisdictions in which they operate to determine if they are compliant with state and federal law.
No comments:
Post a Comment