For boys vulnerable to schizophrenia, cannabis use may change brain structure
The study examines almost 1,600 subjects,
some of whom did, and some of whom did not use marijuana before the age
of 16. Some subjects had a high risk of schizophrenia, and some had a
low risk, based on polygenic testing (testing numerous genetic locations
for traits associated with schizophrenia).
The goal was to find the effect of
cannabis use on the development of the cerebral cortex — the outer layer
of brain tissue, which plays an important role in perception, memory,
language, and consciousness in general.
Among male subjects who had a high risk of developing
schizophrenia, those who used cannabis during adolescence developed
significantly thinner cerebral cortices than those who didn’t, and the
more often a subject used cannabis, the more pronounced the effect was.
But males with a low risk of schizophrenia saw no change to their
cerebral development as a result of cannabis use, and females at either
high or low risk were likewise unaffected.
Paus is quick to point out that the study
doesn’t prove any sort of cause-and-effect relationship — there may be
some other factor affecting cortical thickness that also creates
conditions in which a youth would be more likely to use marijuana. He
does note, however, that the thinning is most pronounced in areas of the
cortex with more cannabinoid receptors, so there is some evidence that
cannabis itself is at fault.
The ultimate answers to questions of
causation, says Paus, lie in experimental work, not in work that studies
health trends across populations like his. But a good first step, he
thinks, would be longer-term studies with larger samples, to more
concretely establish the link between cannabis use, cortical
development, and schizophrenia.
The current study is nonetheless an
important step in exploring the development of mental disorders in
adolescence, and identifying the role of cannabis use in brain
development.
Paus is aware that the study has been
released into a contentious political climate, with three dominant
political parties and as many positions on marijuana legalization.
However, he cautions those who would attach any political significance
to his results, saying “This kind of research does not contribute to
policy decisions” — at least until it proves more concrete connections
between marijuana use and mental illness.
This is not to diminish the importance of
the research. Paus thinks that even if it shouldn’t inform policy, this
evidence, in conjunction with other research showing that “adolescent
cannabis use increases probability of schizophrenia later in life,”
should be taken seriously by the academic community and the general
public, especially by those who have significant family histories of
mental illness, or anything else increasing the risk of such illness,
making them more susceptible to the dangers the study highlights.
No comments:
Post a Comment