CBD will finally no longer be in a legal gray area
By Angela Chen
Congress just reached an agreement on proposed legislation
that could make hemp legal to grow in the United States for the first
time in nearly a century. Hemp may be derived from the same plant as
marijuana, but it doesn’t make anyone high and is commonly used in food,
fuel, and bracelets. The new legislation officially acknowledges the difference between the two.
Technically speaking, hemp is a variety of the cannabis
plant that contains less than 0.3 percent tetrahydrocannabinol (THC),
the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana. Though its derivatives have
been used for everything from textiles to medicine,
hemp is currently everywhere in the form of a trendy ingredient called
cannabidiol (CBD). Manufacturers promise that CBD will alleviate pain
and depression and other health issues (despite a lack of solid evidence for many claims), yet CBD has lived in a legal gray area for years because of the tricky legal history of hemp.
Not only have cannabis derivatives like hemp been effectively banned in the US since the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937,
other legislation has categorized marijuana products as dangerous
Schedule I substances like LSD and ecstasy. Then in 2014, Congress
passed legislation that approved small pilot programs for growing hemp,
though to do so, farmers still needed approval from the Drug Enforcement
Administration. (This 2014 provision was part of the Farm Bill,
a massive piece of legislation that sets policy around food and
agriculture. The Farm Bill needs to be renewed every few years, so the
new decision to legalize hemp is part of the proposed 2018 Farm Bill.)
Despite this, there was some debate over whether derivatives of the hemp plant, like CBD, were really excluded from the Controlled Substances Act, according to Shawn Hauser,
a senior associate at cannabis law firm Vicente Sederberg, hence the
legal gray area. “The 2018 bill actually goes in and amends the
Controlled Substances Act to make very clear that CBD derived from hemp
would not be considered a controlled substance,” she says.
This
is “a pretty important step forward in terms of federal government’s
recognition of what CBD is and what its lack of potential harm or risk
is,” says John Hudak, a senior fellow at Brookings Institution and author of Marijuana: A Short History.
There are likely to be more CBD products now, but that still doesn’t
mean that everyone can just grow hemp in their backyard. Farmers will no
longer need DEA approval, but there will still be significant federal
and state restrictions on hemp products and growers will need to be
licensed and fulfill other requirements developed by the US Department
of Agriculture. “It’s not going to be this free-for-all that some people
imagine,” Hudak says.
Proponents of legalizing hemp argue that it provides an
opportunity for new jobs and economic growth, especially because hemp is
a versatile plant that can grow in various climates. For example,
Kentucky — the state of Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch
McConnell, who sponsored the hemp provision — is one of the best places
to grow the plant. “Kentuckians think that this could help replace coal
miner jobs in eastern Kentucky and could jump start local economies that
have really suffered as economic transition has happened,” Hudak says.
At the same time, critics and hemp activists point out
that the language of the bill prevents people with drug-related
convictions from ever taking part in the hemp business, which is a loss for racial justice given that these drug convictions disproportionately have targeted poor people and people of color. Plus, this prevents growers with marijuana experience from entering the labor market. Growers will also continue to face environmental issues such as water use and energy consumption as hemp cultivation expands from smaller pilot projects to larger-scale agricultural enterprises.
Justin Strekal, political director of the pro-marijuana
group NORML praised the agreement but said new regulations are needed.
“For years, many of the producers of these products have navigated in a
grey area of the law — manufacturing products of variable and sometimes
questionable quality and safety,” Strekal stated. “Now it is time for
lawmakers to craft simple benchmark safety and quality standards for
hemp-derived CBD in order to increase consumer satisfaction and
confidence as this nascent industry transitions into a legal
marketplace.”
The House and the Senate both need to officially vote on
the new legislation, which is expected before the end of the year. As
Hauser says: “We’re still in infancy at the precipice of a new business
which other industrialized countries have had for decades.”
No comments:
Post a Comment