Debayan Roy
New Delhi:
Dharamvir Gandhi, Lok Sabha MP from Punjab, wants to legalise cannabis.
And he is getting able support from a few of his Parliament colleagues
like actor-turned-politician and BJP MP Vinod Khanna besides a former
head of India's narcotics watchdog.
Gandhi, the AAP MP from
Patiala in Punjab, is moving a private member's bill seeking to legalise
the recreational use of cannabis in India. The bill has been cleared by
the legislative branch of Parliament and will be moved in this session
starting November 20.
"Soft
drugs are part of the cultural history of India and does not lead to an
abusive lifestyle or rise in crime. It was only used as a measure of
'mauj-masti' (relaxation and enjoyment) by the common people," Gandhi
told News18.
Gandhi believes that the current law governing
narcotics has only helped the case of the drug mafia and has helped
proliferation of more harmful drugs like cocaine, smack and heroine. His
bill seeks to permit authorised and monitored sale of soft drugs and
seeks to legitimise cultivation, production, possession, manufacture,
sale, transport, and inter-state export, import, use and consumption of
such soft drugs.
"Even after 35 years of the Narcotic Drugs and
Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, it has failed to achieve the
objectives for which it was passed. Neither could it make India a
drug-free nation nor was it able to curtail the dangerous network of
drug mafias across the nation and the globe," Gandhi said, adding that
his bill already has the support of a few MPs including his fellow
Punjabi MP and BJP leader Vinod Khanna and Odisha's BJD MP Tathagata
Satpathy.
News18 could not contact Khanna and Satpathy.
Well,
of course, private member's bills have a history of failing at the
hustings and this too might suffer the same fate. In the last 46 years,
no private member bill has been passed except a bill pertaining to
transgender rights.
Tripti Tandon, deputy director of Lawyers
Collective and a researcher on Indian narcotics, told News18 that
regardless of its fate the very fact that the issue will be taken up by
the House is a positive step.
"This bill will be debated and that
is a positive step, but this bill will never be passed by the House.
There are regulations and rules with NDPS act to be followed by the
states, but they are never looked into. Though this bill will have some
supporters it will not gain majority support because of the lack of
understanding concerning drugs and the entire paranoia surrounding this
issue," she said.
Last year, the Uttarakhand government had
legalised hemp cultivation (a variant of the cannabis strain) but it was
only for industrial purposes.
Interestingly, Gandhi's move has got support from a former head of the Central Bureau of Narcotics.
Romesh
Bhattacharji, former commissioner of Central Bureau of Narcotics, and
currently a member of the Institute for Narcotics Studies, told News18
that the bill would be "an excellent move to rectify an erroneous law."
"This
is a good move, and this needs to be debated in the face of such stiff
ignorance which often takes root in the moral high grounds people take
after being influenced by the UN conventions. This law has been
victimising people since 1985," he said.
Bhattacharji said that he
had conducted a survey in Punjab from 2001 to 2011 and the data showed
that around 25,003 were languishing behind bars under the NDPS Act. Out
of that only 10 to 60 people were drug-traffickers and the rest were the
poor charged with offences of possessing soft drugs.
"In 1999,
during my tenure at the Narcotics Control Bureau, I had proposed the
idea of creating an Opium registry which would deliver opium to
Registered Opium users in India since 1971 from the government treasury,
but the Ministry of Finance rejected the idea without applying any mind
to the grave concern staring at us. I am happy at least now there will
be deliberations to amend this act," he said.
Analysts believe
that the classification of hard drugs and soft rugs – which is what
essentially Gandhi's bill demands – is not something which is new, and
has its roots in the early legislative history of the NDPS act.
Lawyer's
Collective's Tandon said even when the present NDPS act was being
passed, many MPs had voiced their opposition citing the need for such a
classification. "But it never gained any traction, primarily because
government believes these soft drugs are 'gateway drugs' which leads to
addiction to the harder ones," she said.
Tandon said there has
been no study to validate government's claim of 'gateway drugs' and even
symptoms like seizures, fits, etc did not corroborate the claim of the
authorities.
No comments:
Post a Comment