"Our office recognized the undue burden that these prior convictions can have on people's livelihood, both past and present."
By Press Release Desk, News Partner
Press release from the County of Santa Cruz Office of the District Attorney:
Santa
Cruz County District Attorney Jeffrey S. Rosell announced today that in
recognition of the undue burden that prior marijuana convictions can
have on people's lives has petitioned the Santa Cruz County Superior
Court to reduce, dismiss and seal 1,169 marijuana cases involving 1,085
defendants pursuant to Proposition 64 and Assembly Bill 1793.
In
November of 2016, California voters passed Proposition 64, the Control,
Regulate, and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act. Proposition 64 legalized
the recreational use of marijuana for adults; created a system for
regulating non-medical marijuana businesses; imposed taxes on the sale
of marijuana; and changed the penalties for marijuana-related crimes.
Prop 64 also permitted individuals who had previously been convicted of
qualifying marijuana-related crimes that became lesser offenses, or non-
crimes, to petition the court for resentencing, dismissal and sealing,
or re-designation. Proposition 64 passed in Santa Cruz County with
nearly 70% approval.
With the legalization of marijuana in
California, the District Attorney's Office recognized that a fundamental
unfairness exists for people who are suffering the consequences of a
criminal conviction for conduct that is currently legal. For many
people, especially in communities hit hardest from the "war on drugs",
these old arrests and convictions, in some cases for minor amounts of
marijuana, still haunt members of our community as they fill out job
applications or apply for housing or other benefits. This inequity
needed to be remedied.
During
the past year, the Santa Cruz County District Attorney's Office worked
with the California Department of Justice, the Santa Cruz County
Probation Department, and the Santa Cruz County Superior Court to
identify all cases that qualify for relief. After a thorough review, the
District Attorney's Office has elected to petition the court to dismiss
all qualifying marijuana convictions dating back to 1969.
"Our
office recognized the undue burden that these prior convictions can have
on people's livelihood, both past and present. The decision to dismiss
these cases provides much-needed relief to the non-violent people caught
up in the 'war on drugs' and level the playing field for people
convicted of crimes that are no longer crimes." said Rosell.
Press release from the County of Santa Cruz Office of the District Attorney:
Santa
Cruz County District Attorney Jeffrey S. Rosell announced today that in
recognition of the undue burden that prior marijuana convictions can
have on people's lives has petitioned the Santa Cruz County Superior
Court to reduce, dismiss and seal 1,169 marijuana cases involving 1,085
defendants pursuant to Proposition 64 and Assembly Bill 1793.
In November of 2016, California voters passed Proposition 64, the Control, Regulate, and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act. Proposition 64 legalized the recreational use of marijuana for adults; created a system for regulating non-medical marijuana businesses; imposed taxes on the sale of marijuana; and changed the penalties for marijuana-related crimes. Prop 64 also permitted individuals who had previously been convicted of qualifying marijuana-related crimes that became lesser offenses, or non- crimes, to petition the court for resentencing, dismissal and sealing, or re-designation. Proposition 64 passed in Santa Cruz County with nearly 70% approval.
With the legalization of marijuana in California, the District Attorney's Office recognized that a fundamental unfairness exists for people who are suffering the consequences of a criminal conviction for conduct that is currently legal. For many people, especially in communities hit hardest from the "war on drugs", these old arrests and convictions, in some cases for minor amounts of marijuana, still haunt members of our community as they fill out job applications or apply for housing or other benefits. This inequity needed to be remedied.
In November of 2016, California voters passed Proposition 64, the Control, Regulate, and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act. Proposition 64 legalized the recreational use of marijuana for adults; created a system for regulating non-medical marijuana businesses; imposed taxes on the sale of marijuana; and changed the penalties for marijuana-related crimes. Prop 64 also permitted individuals who had previously been convicted of qualifying marijuana-related crimes that became lesser offenses, or non- crimes, to petition the court for resentencing, dismissal and sealing, or re-designation. Proposition 64 passed in Santa Cruz County with nearly 70% approval.
With the legalization of marijuana in California, the District Attorney's Office recognized that a fundamental unfairness exists for people who are suffering the consequences of a criminal conviction for conduct that is currently legal. For many people, especially in communities hit hardest from the "war on drugs", these old arrests and convictions, in some cases for minor amounts of marijuana, still haunt members of our community as they fill out job applications or apply for housing or other benefits. This inequity needed to be remedied.
During
the past year, the Santa Cruz County District Attorney's Office worked
with the California Department of Justice, the Santa Cruz County
Probation Department, and the Santa Cruz County Superior Court to
identify all cases that qualify for relief. After a thorough review, the
District Attorney's Office has elected to petition the court to dismiss
all qualifying marijuana convictions dating back to 1969.
"Our office recognized the undue burden that these prior convictions can have on people's livelihood, both past and present. The decision to dismiss these cases provides much-needed relief to the non-violent people caught up in the 'war on drugs' and level the playing field for people convicted of crimes that are no longer crimes." said Rosell.
"Our office recognized the undue burden that these prior convictions can have on people's livelihood, both past and present. The decision to dismiss these cases provides much-needed relief to the non-violent people caught up in the 'war on drugs' and level the playing field for people convicted of crimes that are no longer crimes." said Rosell.
No comments:
Post a Comment