Photo Credit: Blablo101/Shutterstock.com
Contentions that scientists have failed to conduct
sufficient research on the health and societal effects of cannabis are
unfounded. A keyword search on the National Library of Medicine database
reveals over 23,000 peer-reviewed papers
specific to the marijuana plant, and new scientific discoveries are
published almost daily debunking the federal government’s claims that
the herb is a highly dangerous substance lacking therapeutic efficacy.
Here are five new cannabis-centric studies that challenge longstanding
marijuana myths.
Marijuana abuse is on the decline
Contrary to what you may have heard,
the percentage of Americans reporting having experienced pot-related
problems is declining. That’s according to the results of a newly
published study in the journal JAMA Psychiatry.
Investigators
at the Washington School of Medicine in St. Louis assessed trends in
marijuana use and in the prevalence of marijuana use disorders during
the years 2002 to 2013. Researchers found that the self-reported use of
cannabis by adults increased an estimated 19 percent, but that reports
of cannabis-related problems actually declined during this period.
"We're certainly seeing some increases in marijuana use," the lead researcher of the study said
. "But our survey didn't notice any increase in marijuana-related
problems. Certainly, some people are having problems so we should remain
vigilant, but the sky is not falling."
Separate
evaluations of self-reported marijuana use by young people have
determined that rates of cannabis use by high-school students are significantly lower today than they were 15 years ago.
The study's findings contradict those of a widely publicized 2015 paper
which alleged that the use of marijuana had doubled over the past
decade and that an estimated one-third of those who consumed cannabis
did so problematically. Predictably, while the 2015 study received
widespread coverage, only a handful of media outlets have published
follow up stories highlighting the revised data.
Pot is associated with compensatory driving behavior; booze is not
Stoned drivers are slower drivers. That is the finding of a just published federal study in the Journal of Applied Toxicology. Its conclusions mimic those reported in a series of on-road driving studies performed by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in the 1990s.
Investigators affiliated with the US National Institute on Drug Abuse and the University of Iowa assessed the effects of vaporized cannabis on simulated driving performance. Researchers report that cannabis-positive subjects decreased their speed and increased the distance between their vehicle and the car in front of them, while alcohol-positive participants did the opposite.
“The compensatory behavior exhibited by cannabis-influenced drivers distinctly contrasts with an alcohol-induced higher risk behavior,” authors concluded.
While some studies have reported that THC-positive drivers possess a nearly two-fold risk of motor vehicle accident compared to drug-free drivers, other reviews have reported comparatively less risk and, in some cases, no elevated risk after adjusting for confounding variables such as age and gender.
By contrast, driving with legal amounts of booze in one’s system is associated with a four-fold increased crash risk, while operating a motor vehicle with two or more passengers more than doubles one’s risk of a motor vehicle crash.
Smoking pot won’t make you depressed, but some depressed people smoke pot
Long standing claims that smoking pot leads to depression have been rejected in a new longitudinal study published in the Journal of Affective Disorders.
A team of Swedish investigators conducted a three-year prospective study in a cohort of 8,600 men between the ages of 20 and 64 to assess whether cannabis use was associated with increased incidences of depression later in life. After scientists adjusted for potentially confounding variables, such as other illicit drug use and family tension, they reported no link between pot use and symptoms of clinical depression or anxiety.
Investigators did find that subjects who reported suffering from depression during their baseline interviews were more likely to be pot smokers at follow up. However, these respondents were also more likely to consume other illicit drugs as well.
Pot mitigates chronic pain, reduces patients’ need for opioids
When New York lawmakers signed off on legislation in 2014 authorizing the use of medical marijuana, they refused to permit chronic pain patients the opportunity to utilize cannabis therapy.
Their decision, which is now codified in New York state law, flies in the face of compassion and science. That’s because the daily use of cannabis provides pain relief and reduces opioid use in patients with treatment-resistant chronic pain conditions, according to clinical trial data reported online ahead of print in The Clinical Journal of Pain.
Investigators
with Hebrew University in Israel evaluated the use of cannabis on pain
in a cohort of 176 patients, each of whom had been previously
unresponsive to all conventional pain medications. Subjects inhaled
THC-dominant cannabis daily (up to 20 grams per month) for a period of
at least six months.
A majority of the
study’s participants (66 percent) experienced improvement in their pain
symptom scores after cannabis therapy, and most reported "robust"
improvements in their quality of life. Subjects' overall consumption of
opioid drugs declined 44 percent by the end of the trial, and a
significant percentage of participants discontinued opioid therapy
altogether over the course of the study.
The Israeli results are similar to those reported in a 2015 Canadian trial which concluded that chronic pain patients who use herbal cannabis daily for one-year experienced reduced discomfort and increased quality of life compared to controls, and did not possess an increased risk of serious side effects.
The Israeli results are similar to those reported in a 2015 Canadian trial which concluded that chronic pain patients who use herbal cannabis daily for one-year experienced reduced discomfort and increased quality of life compared to controls, and did not possess an increased risk of serious side effects.
Separate data
published in 2014 in The Journal of the American Medical
Association determined that states with medical marijuana laws
experience far fewer opiate-related deaths than do states that prohibit
the plant. Investigators from the RAND Corporation reported similar findings
in 2015, concluding, "States permitting medical marijuana dispensaries
experience a relative decrease in both opioid addictions and opioid
overdose deaths compared to states that do not.”
Repeated claims that the enactment of medical cannabis laws is associated with spikes in youth marijuana use are categorically false. Want proof? According to a new review of US federal drug use data from the years 2002 to 2011, “[T]here is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML (medical marijuana laws).”
While the study’s authors acknowledged that many medical marijuana states have higher rates of cannabis use compared to non-medical states, they affirmed that these jurisdictions already possessed elevated use rates prior to any change in law and that the enactments of laws did not causally contribute to this change. They are hardly alone in their assessment.
In 2015, investigators at Columbia University in New York and the University of Michigan assessed the relationship between state medical marijuana laws and rates of self-reported adolescent marijuana use over a 24-year period in a sampling of over one million adolescents in 48 states. Researchers reported no increase in teens’ overall pot use that could be attributable to changes in law, and acknowledged a “robust” decrease in use among 8th graders.
They concluded: “[T]he results of this study showed no evidence for an increase in adolescent marijuana use after the passage of state laws permitting use of marijuana for medical purposes. … [C]oncerns that increased marijuana use is an unintended effect of state marijuana laws seem unfounded.”
And they weren’t alone either. In fact, their conclusions were consistent with the findings of nearly a dozen similar studies
No comments:
Post a Comment