|
|
DENVER (AP) -- The legalization of marijuana in Colorado hasn't
solved the racial disparities in enforcement that drug-policy reformers
had hoped to end, with blacks still far more likely than whites to be
charged with pot-related crimes, a new report says.
The
report, issued Wednesday by the pro-legalization Drug Policy Alliance,
showed that marijuana arrests in Colorado all but stopped after voters
made the drug legal in small amounts for those 21 and older.
But
the report noted continuing racial disparities involving the marijuana
crimes that remain, including public use and possession in excess of the
one-ounce limit.
The study examined drug arrests in all 64 Colorado counties for two years before and two years after legalization in 2012.
The
total number of charges for pot possession, distribution and
cultivation plummeted almost 95 percent, from about 39,000 in 2010 to
just over 2,000 last year.
Even after
legalization, blacks were more than twice as likely as whites to be
charged with public use of marijuana. Blacks were also much more likely
to be charged with illegal cultivation of pot or possession of more than
an ounce.
"Legalization is no panacea for the
longtime issues that law enforcement had with the black and brown
community," said Art Way, Colorado director for the Drug Policy
Alliance.
Still, the drop-off in overall arrests is good news for minorities, said Tony Newman, also of the Drug Policy Alliance.
"Despite
the unsurprising racial disparities, these massive drops in arrests
have been enormously beneficial to people of color," Newman said.
The
analysis did not break out data for Colorado's largest ethnic minority,
Latinos. That's because data comes from the National Incident-Based
Reporting System, which does not tally numbers for Latinos.
The
region's top law officer for coordinating drug enforcement, Tom Gorman
of the Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area program,
insisted that officers are not racially profiling pot users.
"Racial
disparities exist in other laws. What does that mean, that homicide
law, rape laws, weapon laws are racist? There are other factors going on
here that we need to address," Gorman said.
After
legalization, racial disparities did ease somewhat for marijuana
distribution charges. Blacks accounted for about 22 percent of such
arrests in 2010 and around 18 percent in 2014.
The arrest data got a mixed response from the regional head of the NAACP.
"The
overall decrease in arrests, charges and cases is enormously beneficial
to communities of color who bore the brunt of marijuana prohibition,"
Rosemary Harris Lytle said in a statement.
"However,
we are concerned with the rise in disparity for the charge of public
consumption and challenge law enforcement to ensure this reality is not
discriminatory in any manner."
In 2014, the
year Colorado's recreational marijuana stores opened, blacks were 3.9
percent of the population but accounted for 9.2 percent of pot
possession arrests.
For illegal marijuana cultivation, the disparities didn't just persist. They got much worse.
In
2010, whites in Colorado were slightly more likely than blacks to be
arrested for growing pot. After legalization, the arrest rate for whites
dropped dramatically but ticked up for blacks. In 2014, the arrest rate
for blacks was roughly 2.5 times higher.
The
Drug Policy Alliance did not conduct a similar analysis in Washington
state, which also legalized pot in 2012. But racial disparities appear
to have persisted there, too.
Last September,
Seattle's elected prosecutor dropped all tickets issued for the public
use of marijuana through the first seven months of 2014 because most of
them were written by a single police officer who disagreed with the
legal pot law.
About one-third of those tickets were issued to blacks, who make up about 8 percent of Seattle's population.
A
researcher who did not work on the Drug Policy Alliance report,
sociologist Pamela E. Oliver of the University of Wisconsin, said the
numbers reflect greater law enforcement attention paid to blacks.
"Black
communities, and black people in predominantly white communities, tend
to be generally under higher levels of surveillance than whites and
white communities," she said in an email, "and this is probably why
these disparities are arising."
No comments:
Post a Comment